Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Duh? (Score 1) 73

You joke about gamma rays but there isn't much of difference between X rays and gamma rays from a biological perspective.

I'd be interested in what happens to those that have received several head CT scans. One head CT scan is about 20 years of background radiation.

Comment Re:Try again... 4? (Score 2) 226

Maybe RADIO had something to do with it......You know getting free music for almost a CENTURY...

Radio isn't "free." The radio stations had to pay the record labels, songwriters and artists for the music they played. In turn, they charged businesses money for - horrors - "unskippable" ads that you had to listen to. Or in the case of public radio stations, asking you for money directly to keep them on the air.

There is no free lunch.

Comment They can win easily. (Score 1) 514

If that 10 years is maintenance free as in I don't have to do anything to it He will win big.
The biggest problem with off grid solar+wind installs is that caring for the battery bank is outside of the abilities of 80% of the population. If musk can make an off grid solar/wind install a zero effort/ zero care system where the drooling masses don't have to do anything.....

That will get the adoption rates way up, if the payback is within 5 years.

Comment Re:/.er bitcoin comments are the best! (Score 1) 253

The Data from payment processors reflects spikes in spending with bitcoin when it goes through disinflationary bubbles however. Perhaps your Econ101 professor didn't understand everything?

Or perhaps he understood more than you, and those spending spikes reflect idiot speculators trying to unload bitcoins before they fall too far? Kind of like the spike in unloading any speculated currency or commodity when it starts to crash?

Also - honest question - you keep referring to "disinflationary." That's not a term I have heard before, can you explain where this term came from and how it differs from deflation?

Submission + - Who Are The One Percent of the One Percent of US Political Donors?

schnell writes: "In 2014, one out of every five dollars that was contributed to political candidates came from a group of about 32,000 donors — one-one-hundredth of one-one-hundredth of the population of the country," according to the Washington Post and two political watchdog groups. They have mapped (by party and by population) where this money comes from, and their potentially unsurprising conclusion: financiers in New York, oilmen in Texas and techies in the Bay Area are the biggest individual spenders. But is it the other 80% of money donated — from the Bible Belt, rural America and other places — that is heard more loudly?

Comment Re: I like this guy but... (Score 2) 438

And that is the solution. TAX Intellectual Property.

Sony bitches about $200 million lost in piracy? Let the IRS tax them on their new made up bullshit number. Suddenly IP "losses" go to sane levels.

I want IP taxed at 15% of the value claimed, and any claim in court asking for more due to piracy, is charged RETROACTIVELY by the IRS.

Comment Re:Twisted perception (Score 1) 185

Fair enough point. But the rationale for the gold standard I have heard from most proponents was that paper money "isn't real" and only has value as a more convenient way of, in effect, carrying gold around since it has "real value." (I also find more than a little irony in having met a few of these folks who are also major proponents of BitCoin and manage to swallow the cognitive dissonance nicely.)

If your rationale for supporting a return to the gold standard is keeping governments honest about their spending, then I find that much more rational. It just seems from historical example to be incompatible with promoting real economic growth, or dealing with expediencies (for example, financing World War I was the reason most countries got off the gold standard in the first place).

Slashdot Top Deals

"I've seen it. It's rubbish." -- Marvin the Paranoid Android

Working...