Because you actually need to RTFA.

This is linked in the article: http://copyright.gov/1201/2015...

Relevant section:

You'll see "Global" in that quote mind you. But if you look at some of the organizations, they include companies like Honda, Nissan, Kia, Hyundai, Toyota, Volvo, etc. I'm gonna just chalk this up to anti-American bias.

In a living document, the interpretation does not or should not change. If something needs to change, then the document must be amended. Supreme Court decisions regarding the First Amendment will reference Jefferson's Statute here, because it had major influence on how the First Amendment was written, particularly the Establishment Clause. The Constitution is a holy document, that's the point of it. It is above the power of any single person. If a statute, law or, ruling contradicts the Constitution then the former is invalid. If you have a problem with the historical understanding of a portion of the Constitution you need to push for an amendment.

The basis and history for our religious freedom laws precludes such a decision.

This article on Jefferson's VA Statute for Religious Freedom for example:
http://www.theatlantic.com/pas...

It usually has to have some historical merit before it get's to tax exempt status.

Thanks for compiling a character sequence list and explaining the algorithm...

Strawman! HO!

I'm not wasting real mod points for an AC, but +1 for the Year One reference.

Columbine happened five years after the ESRB was created.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

It's actually the opposite. Game titles tend to want to hit the T rating for games so they draw from the largest pool possible. Destiny is a good recent example of a game that toned down its content to hit a T rating.

Because blue screen of death dude!!

Look at the Continuum feature in Win10. That's all I can say. Here's a recent CNN article that shows the feature being demo'd: http://money.cnn.com/2015/03/1...

Here's a different one she may have broken, http://www.foxnews.com/politic...

Apparently, after leaving the the department you sign this form (http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/download/115326)

If she signed that she lied and therefore essentially lied under oath.

Wow really? Everyone attacking her is being a hypocrite? The argument is stupid, deal with it. If it was wrong when Bush did it, it's wrong now. And the people using arguments like cahuenga's are being the real hypocrites.

Are you touched in the head? Seriously? Bush did it, so let's not worry. Wrong is wrong, Bush got away with it, fine. Let's not let another person get away with. Particularly, the person who called the Bush administration corrupt and full of cronyism over their email scandal (she did this in 2007 btw).

Except in 2007 Hillary in a speech denounced the "secretive" Bush administration practices, calling it cronyism and corruption. She then has the gall to do this. Really?