Even once we had airplanes, you have only a lifetime from 1903 to 1969, yet people in 1903 couldn't have dreamed of what the Saturn V would look like or how it would work.
There were rockets in 1903. They weren't as powerful, but the physics of rocket flight was pretty well known at the time.
The only difference between fireworks and the Saturn V is scale...more powerful fuel, stronger materials, etc.
Hell yeah, and the only difference between modern computers and the cryptological bombas used during WW2 is just electronics miniaturization! Stupid elementary stuff my friends! Yeah, it's not so simple my friend. There's a reason it takes *decades* and thousands of brilliant minds to advance technology step by step. The Saturn V is not simply a bigger, better version of "fireworks". You've been playing too much Kerbal space program.
The Sarbanes-Oxley act has been on the books since 2002. Dodd-Frank bill since 2010. So are they working to keep companies in check and increase transparency? Or just costing both the government and the companies it affects a bunch of time and money? On one side you can say this activity was finally caught. On the other hand you have to ask when large banks are subject to regular audits how do they get away with it from year to year?
From my own limited personal experience, the only thing I can say for sure is that those audits are usually pretty terrible. In theory they're looking for the right stuff, but the auditors themselves are usually green accountants who often lack the hybrid blend of accounting, technical, and IT skills needed to any proper analysis. They don't understand what they're looking at and don't know what to ask for. They usually just follow a sheet of instructions line by line and check those boxes to indicate their work is done. I don't think that quite captures the spirit of those laws.
Evidence suggests online definitely does not help social skills, you've never played online, that's clear.
Games are a time sink, they're entertainment. They don't improve any skills whatsoever. Having a twitching finger is limited to muscle memory, which is so limited it's useless outside of holding a controller. Imagine that time used learning to actually play an instrument instead.
tldr; games are a waste of time like TV, improve nothing and exist for entertainment.
I love how everyone always loves to see things in black and white. To hell with gray and all of its multiple points, variables, and conclusions. Considering games (and online ones too) vary wildly from hermit-like pressing a single button repetitively vs. memorizing complexities and extreme social cooperation, your mileage will vary extremely from game to game. Even within the same game people will have different experiences. Yes we've all seen games change people. Sometimes for both better, sometimes for worse, and sometimes both. Surprise, surprise, this closely resembles any other life experience with anything?
Games can be crafted and played in various ways, they can be even crafted to teach. But I still agree at the end of the day, most games are entertainment. They don't teach you astrophysics. Especially when you consider the game play these days by volume, most of it is mindless screen mashing cell phone games. Most complex games, or games that focus on ultra-realism, are usually niche games with only 10's of thousands of players instead of millions.
They're not fragile at all. If you perturb them, it just re-stabilizes at a new equilibrium point. e.g. If you tilt the bowl in the wiki picture, the ball doesn't fall off the top of the bowl like in the first picture or roll away like in the third picture.. It just settles in at a different spot on the bottom of the bowl in the second picture, now-tilted slightly.
This made me chuckle, I think your own argument flew right over your own head. As you've clearly pointed out, disrupting an the original equilibrium creates a new and different equilibrium. Yes, you sir are absolutely correct.
So let's use an extreme example. Let's destroy photosynthesis driven life on this planet somehow. What happens then? Hey the ecosystem now will search our its new equilibrium which now only includes life that survive by feeding off the energy from geothermic vents! What's wrong? We've found our new equilibrium, clearly there's no fragility here. Everyone can keep calm and carry on
As soon as he no longer had congress. It's as if it's all just political posturing or something...
It's like he said, "oh yeah, I forgot about that 'change' thing I promised". It's about time something like this went down, I can't stand how the US setup has its telecom infrastructure currently setup.
Those who purchased a Hybrid when they first came out did so to save money but in most cases they didn't. The cost of keeping the vehicle on the road past the 6 year mark outweigh the cost of gasoline in most cases. The reason is that the cost of ownership is higher than a regular car because as you know, there are a million car shops that can fix technology from the 80's and parts are readily available at low cost.
Which hybrid models are you talking about? I heard quite the opposite on a Prius but I'm totally unfamiliar with the dozens of other flavors out there...
To these kids, teaching them some grit, self-control, curiosity would probably benefit them 1000x more and improve their life and the next generation.
Yet, somehow it is considered unfair if we did that because then we'd be admitting they are not as advanced as other kids. Yes, they're not.
It's a great thought but which is worse, denying them opportunities for social mobility or teaching them only what they need to know? I know we have tons of problems in the US but the idea still survives here that you can reach for any rung in the ladder if you dare and work to climb. We wouldn't want to jeopardize that. So I think you just have to do both. I'd also further argue the primary responsibility of teaching children grit, self-control, curiosity lies with the family. Schools can only be asked to reinforce it. We really need to return to the notion that families raise their own kids and they go to school primarily for education and everything else is secondary.
I was raised in an immigrant family with humble beginnings and very high expectations. That was reinforced on a near daily basis. How could we ever expect teachers to teach that? It's just not their place.
Solar power repays its energy cost in production in 6 to 12 months, not decades and it lasts over 30 years, not just 20
Ofc you are right otherwise, except perhaps that storage is overrated. Storage is pointless as long as you are far away from even producing 50% of your needs by renewables.
Storage is interesting if you want to take your house (or boat or caravan) off grid. For a nation spanning grid it is nearly irrelevant until you approach 100% production of peak demand.
Maybe you can cite some of your sources? I'm all about renewable energy, but it sounds like you're cherry picking and blurring data.
Already, computers are waaay more powerful than human minds, we just haven't figured out how to steer all this power towards actual intelligence.
You're either severely overestimating today's computing technology or severely underestimating human brain power. Scratch that, you're most likely severely doing both. As of today, computers are only good at reproducing very specific tasks and doing them extremely well (most times). Solving massive computational problems does not equate intelligence!!!!
Intelligence: Intelligence has been defined in many different ways such as in terms of one's capacity for logic, abstract thought, understanding, self-awareness, communication, learning, emotional knowledge, memory, planning, creativity and problem solving. Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I...
Like countless folks have already said, modern computational technology has barely touched the surface of intelligence. There's no scratch there yet, not even a finger print blemish. You'll struggle to make comparisons with even the dumbest living organism on earth, like for instance the amoeba, against the likes of today's AI. I for one don't expect we'll make any major break-through in AI until we actually figure out how our own damned brains work.
New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman