And yes, Google Play In-app Billing for digital products also is to be used for "Subscription services, such as streaming music".

So even if Google doesn't want a share of the profits (yet), they most certainly require apps on the Play Store to use their In App Purchase processing service. Something which you want to deny Apple.

Which Spotify has done before Apple - you do agree that Apple should sue them.

Knowing Wallstreet analysts, this will actually drive down AAPL. I can see Business Insider's headline: "Apple's need to bring back Steve Jobs from the dead proves they are doomed."

Not to mention that all the Steve-Jobs-would-never-do-this arguments from Apple critics would revert back to Steve-Jobs-and-his-usual-blunders.

White Republican politicians.

I wonder if they will drop the "Climate scientists warned of a coming Ice Age in the 70s" bit instead.

Hey, left-turner could actually learn from that video: "Look out the windshield. When you see a pedestrian over there, don't drive to that place."

Better yet, wear a gun and shoot all who want to kill you. Is that legal in NYC?

Joking aside, the left-turners will usually come from behind you on your right side when you're only a few feet from reaching the curb[1]. Most people don't have eyes in the back of their head, and asking pedestrians to look behind them when they have almost finished crossing the street, instead of telling the drivers to fucking look ahead for pedestrians who have the right of way shows you are an asshole.

[1] Unless we're talking about those wankers who step on the gas to cross the lanes before oncoming traffic comes, usually forcing those to break, stalling all traffic.

We're not looking for a cost-efficient way to kill somebody, we're looking at the potential risk of an engine design. And that will use as much tritium as it needs, cost for a part of it will not matter much as long as the total cost will be acceptable for its use.

I"m guessing running over kids is just part of that FUN?

Short answer: when drivers finally find a gap in oncoming traffic while turning left, they are likely to be much faster at the pedestrian traffic than when doing a right turn.

Long answer - TLDR: accidents with pedestrians are >3 times as likely on left turns as on right turns.

Because they say "three rights equal a left"? Or isn't it the exact opposite: more turns to the right?

That wold be fine, if Google cared. Hey, they fixed the "turn left" where there's a "no left turn" they send me the last time - but the U-turn they want me to do on the next intersection where there's a "no U-turn" sign is hardly better. At least in Germany Google Maps' database is still lousy.