Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:A logical response (Score 1) 101

no, it would have more to do with it being effectively a conviction and punishment without due process let alone accusation.

I'm beginning to think you are having a stroke, your lack of context and knowledge of definitions is so striking.

that or you just suffer from diarrhea of the mouth, issuing random phrases you heard once.

Comment Re:5 years (Score 1) 293

only on the topic of global warming is the stereotypically abysmal quality of science reporting of major media ignored and their statements treated like the absolute Gospel of what every scientist involved has ever believed, ever.

here's a clue: news reporters != scientists
so just cause they say it, doesnt mean the scientific community is saying it.

Comment Re:Good thing climate change isn't real! (Score 1) 293

so what do your models say?
how do you explain the sharply rising CO2 levels compared to the historical rate of increase?
the increasing temperatures?

oh thats right.
you cant.
cause you dont have anything but bullshit, since all the actual science is over here.

call it religion all you want, but until you get some science and basic facts on your side, there's only one of us subscribing to a religion based on faith instead of observational and testable facts. and it aint us.

Comment Re:Good thing climate change isn't real! (Score 5, Insightful) 293

that's an awful long post.
too bad its all bullshit.
such a waste of time and effort.

-no one is asking to give politicians "unlimited power to regulate every aspect of your life"
-lots of people, far smarter than you, have already investigated, tested, and evaluated all the various natural process candidates.
-no one is saying we need to get below 100ppm CO2
-you ask for scientific evidence, when there are already tens of thousands of scientific reports and papers and findings already published.
-actually all of the observations DO support the theory. in fact they are the basis of it.
-actually all of the satellite data DOES support it.
-funny you mention the "adjustments". all the adjustments made actually lower the amount of apparent warming. it's not adjusted to match the theory, its adjusted to account for changes in instruments over the years, or location, or other factors. yeah, that's right. without the adjustments, the apparent amount of warming would be 20% higher.. this may be a shock to you, but a thermometer int he sun will read a higher temperature than one in the shade just a few inches away. so that way all the data is on the same baseline.
-nope, the models havent failed.

seriously, just fuck off.
your tropes are so tired and out of date, its getting boring repeatedly rebutting them every day.

you are the equivalent of a drunk in a bar questioning Einstein. Or more accurately, several thousand Einsteins.
(and seriously, who modded that bullshit insightful?)

Comment Re:Good thing climate change isn't real! (Score 1) 293

Oh i dont know....

Maybe because of the shelfs extreme long stability resulting from the relative climate stability of hte past tens of thousands of years, such stability in fact that if only natural processes were at work the planet would be slightly cooling at the moment? Just an educated guess.

Fuck off troll.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein

Working...