> Is written on it: no photons, no videos?

I hate stadiums that ban photons. I'm just trying to watch the game, dammit!

I think they actually get cut off at GOOOOOOOOOOOA--

You're making an argument based on contracts, which is not the same argument the PL is making.

The effect the OP describes, where after lying on your side for a while the eye which is lower down sees things as slightly warmer (more red) than the eye that is higher up, is completely normal AFAIK. I notice it at least once a week or so. All my family members have confirmed that they experience the same thing--we actually discussed this in our family facebook group a few months back.

Since it seems unlikely that we all have tumors pinching our optical nerves, I'm guessing it's something that happens to everyone and you just haven't noticed it yourself.

Hi, statistician here.

For a single model to predict temperatures higher than what actually happens and for the result to be within the error bars is unremarkable. When all 73 models predict results higher than what happens that indicates some serious systematic bias in the modelling (assuming there wasn't selection bias on the other side, of course--if the heartland folk intentionally ignored models that predicted less warming than actually happened then that's a huge problem). If the models are unbiased ("right on average") I would probably expect about half of them to predict above and half of them to predict below the actual results. (It wouldn't necessarily be exactly half and half, because the error distribution is not necessarily symmetric, but it should probably be somewhere around there.)

I believe that climate change is happening, but I think we're probably generally overestimating both the size of it and our precision.. There are well-recognized biases in various steps of the academic/scientific system--obtaining funding, getting published, making a name for yourself--that encourage this kind of exaggeration of results, in terms of both size and precision.

This is my judgement as a statistician--a kind of meta-scientist, if you will. I have no expertise in climate so I can't speak to the soundness of the mdoels being used, but the statistical behavior of them does raise some flags.

But now we have robots! Surely the problem with previous attempts was simply a lack of technology and resources which we have now solved.

He is claiming that he was trained and worked as a spy for the US government, not (as you seem to think) that he spied on the US government for a foreign power.

Whoa man, whoa. Sentences are your friends, don't abuse them like that.

It's a 72-hour rental, so you can watch it yourself and then rewatch it with friends a couple days later if you want. An option to own it would be nice, but I imagine that will come later.

I don't know where you live, but $5 is half the price of a cinema ticket where I live.

I also get hiccups from spicy food, which is annoying. It started a few years ago, never had a problem as a kid.

My favorite peppers are serranos, but I cut out the seeds and membranes before I eat them. Delicious on pizza--I like the flavor more than jalapenos.

Oh, I get it. You're saying if the typical sysadmin was more like Snowden; I read it as saying if Snowden had been different (i.e. if he had not leaked the documents).

Ignorance is bliss?

It's not new. I suppose you could say it already is a meme.

He doesn't mention latency, but he does say he clocked 915 Mb/s both up and down.

You could try reading the article.

The content is in the first link.

It could have been identified better, but it is there.