When the netbook craze began (2008), I bought a 9" Acer Aspire One, for roughly US$400. That was my main laptop (and, during vacations, my main computer. Yes, I work at a university, so six weeks of vacations every year).

One year ago, I decided it was time to renew. I bought its sucessor, the 10" Acer Aspire One. For US$350. And it's my main computer outside of my office. I am really happy with it.

I have just bumped up its memory (2GB6GB). Besides that, I'm more than satisfied with what I got. I have recommended it to my family — Nowadays, my wife has one, and I have taken three more to her family (mother and two brothers). We are all quite happy with them (except for the sister that insisted on keeping Windows 8).

So, yes, US$400 for a good five year use... Is about US$80 per year. Quite acceptable!

The society needs solidarity. If I get more money than others, a fraction of my income should go to help set a minimum base from where the society as a whole can work. Many people are poor, not because they are lazy or disorganized, but because they started with insurmountable differences in regard to what we like to call the middle class. Having people below the poverty line is not good for the society — If I want crime not to raise, I should invest in not having them hate or envy me because of my better luck.

Of course, I can only do my bit of helping; I live as what in my country would be middle class, maybe even middle-upper. But the more you earn, the better you can endure a higher percentage of it going to help others. And, of course, the more that will end up being.

Completely agree — and complementing my other comment on this thread, just a tiny bit above right now, the main reason why my country (Mexico) is stuck is that ~60% of the economy is informal — So no taxes are collected. and, of course, for the corresponding ~60% of the population living in that economy, there is no social services (health, retirement, etc) that the rest of us do have. Which are not great, granted, but they can be real life savers.

Because they happen at very different moments in time, and have very different meanings. And, of course, because their impact in society are very different.

I live in Mexico. The poorest ~half of the country have to pay very little taxes, if anything. Income tax for workers on low wages is very low. And we have VAT exemption on many prime-need items (i.e. unprocessed food, medicines, books). Income tax raises slowly, then steeply; VAT is flat 16% for everything else.

I am far from rich, but pay a fair share of taxes. And of course, the more you earn, the more you complain about how much you have to pay.

That gives whole new twist to "money does not grow on trees". It did. And yes, some people surely prefered to use their bit of land for money-mining than for having an extra guest room.

Then nobody would be able to listen to him anymore.

OK, mining adds an incentive into solving the puzzle to get enough units of the currency available. BUT OTOH, why should most people invest in mining, particularly when it is not worth its cost anymore? A currency is acquired through labor (or selling stuff) and is exchanged for stuff (or paying for labor). People don't need to generate new bitcoin units, just to use them.

I live in Mexico City.

The initial fear and reaction was not because it was a known-deadly virus, but because it had not yet been established how contagious it would be, which vectors would it be dangerous on. The city was really weird, almost dead, for the first week of the outbreak — People feared overall to get out of their houses, there was a shortage of mouth-covers (that were later found to be basically useless). It took several weeks to get back to normal.

Of course, with AH1N1 people started saying how it was blown out of proportion. I know some people who were conclusively diagnosed with the virus, and basically had to endure a bad flu but nothing else. I know second-hand of people who did die because of it, but they were all basically immuno-depressed or had preexisting respiratory diseases in some way.

Ebola's growth vectors and mortality rates are known and studied. And yes, I'd expect stricter measures and care. But there is no point in comparing a known disease (maybe insufficiently studied, but 40-year-old anyway) and a new one.

Most of America uses decimal.

Canada uses decimal. Mexico uses decimal. Central-American countries use... Well, a very strange mix, lets leave them aside for a bit ;-) But from Colombia until Chile and Argentina, every country uses decimal.

Maybe we should also get the USA to choose a proper country name, as all of us who live in the same continent will continue to insist we are Americans.

Just adding to what the others have stated: RAM speed is in the vicinty of a million times HDD speed. You won't notice a file going to RAM before being sent to the network interface. Doing all of the kludgework for this to happen (if possible!) would be for a negligible gain.

Believe me, they do have building codes, and strictly adhere to them.

My wife is an Argentinian. She is also an architect. We live in Mexico (which is also not as chaotic as some US-dwellers would think). And after four years living here, she still cannot believe how lacking our building codes are in several key aspects. Of course, they are veri strict regarding issues they never even think about (i.e. resistance against earthquakes or hurricanes, depending on the area of the country).

She lived in a smaller city, a province capital, ~330,000 inhabitants. Closed neighbourhoods are forbidden, and even though the market strongly pushes for them, not one has been built. In fact, the few that came close to it were forced open by the government. In larger/denser cities, the building height is perfectly respected, you can see a continuous line of buildings as they are exactly the same height. And the list could go on a lot.

Apple, Blackberry and other providers' devices charge off regular 110/220V AC power just fine: They just require a specific voltage conversor, rectificator and plug.

But yes, I have to yield: I thought GP was refering to the connector only.

Hard to recognize if you were talking about Apple or Blackberry.

Or maybe deep inside Apple owns Blackberry, and pushes it just to compete (unfavorably) with itself?

I must say that I somewhat followed Debian's lengthy discussions on this subject, which were quite interesting and informing, and I don't recall this argument coming up even once. I replied to this because the use case is undertandable to long-time Unix users, but not because I feel it's usual or important.

And yes, I also expect a new piece of software (specially if it's far-reaching compared to its antecesor) to have more CVEs than one that's been used for over 30 years, and works mostly unmodified since basically forever.

I don't have an answer for you, but can direct you to the latest thread on the topic — On August 8, a message was posted to debian-devel@lists.debian.org titled Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop; the thread had 174 messages. Josselin Mouette made a specific question that goes along your question, but I'm sure you will find more.