Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:easy (Score 3, Informative) 61

Of course, I don't think any of us would want to be exposed to a working Tricorder -- they worked by bombarding the subject with EM radiation, including a bunch in the "radioactive" spectrum. In real life, the thing was likely to diagnose you as being in the early stages of cancer due to the tricorder itself..

Did they? I missed that episode.

I always thought that the ideal tricorder could accept a broad spectrum of natural radiations in 3 dimensions and use that to construct a bio-chemical-mechanical model of the subject. Thus the name "tricorder" being equally used for both medical purposes (medical tricorder) and general exploration (for example, Spock's tricorder).

Think about it. Every nanosecond we are being constantly bombarded by radio waves from Jupiter, the Sun, and the stars, cosmic rays, neutrinos, natural radioactivity from the ground we stand on and the air we breathe, light at various frequencies, including UV and IR, sound waves of all frequencies and that's not even factoring in man-made stuff like WKRP AM/FM, the local police/fire/rescue/transportation/etc and business channels or cell phones. Some of that stuff goes straight through, some reflects and/or refracts, some is absorbed selectively by various tissues, some is blocked. All you need is sensors, a computer powerful enough to correlate it, and software that can reduce it to usable data.

Comment Re:It is time to get up one way or the other (Score 1) 1089

That's a cop-out. Voting the party line is just pushing the process back a level. SOMEONE has to select who the party candidates ARE.

The reason that political parties were so despised by Founding Fathers is that they take on a life and allegiance of their own. People do things for the Party, not for the Country. Witness what happened to John McCain.

Parties, in turn devote their allegiance to Ideology. Id(iot)ology is basically adopting a one-size-fits-all approach to problems, whether that size helps or hurts.

In short, too much of American politics operates less on careful thought and more on knee-jerk reaction to a litmus test (to mix metaphors). If the voters would responsibly select who their parties represented, the parties would field responsible candidates. Instead it's all duckspeak and litmus tests because the people who actually vote aren't really interested in thinking things through themselves.

That's what makes drafting people in to vote willy-nilly even less appealing. If we do so badly with those who will at least make the effort to show up when they don't have to, then what would we get if they were joined by people who simply blindly checked things just to get out of the polling booth as quickly as possible.

Never mind. At this stage, we'd probably be better off with random chance anyway.

Comment Re:It is time to get up one way or the other (Score 1) 1089

With voter turnout this epically low, we are at the point where all the eligible voters who don't vote could band together and elect a president and VP who aren't even on the ticket. Whether or not mandatory voting would help is unclear, but voter disenfranchisement doesn't help anyone and neither do all the various voter suppression methods that we see in each election cycle. Something should be done to push back.

Problem is, we ALREADY have too many ignorant people voting in elections. Do you really want the apathetic-ignorant ones in there as well?

You can lead a horse to water, but..

Comment Re:Unfortunately, it's still on piano (Score 2) 59

A harpsichord is quite different than a piano. A piano (pianoforte) operates by the action of key-driven hammers striking the strings. A harpsichord operates by having the keys drive a plucking mechanism instead, like picking a guitar. It makes for a very different tonal quality.

The more important issue here, however is that this is the well-tempered Clavier. Or, more accurately, the even-tempered Clavier. Earlier instruments were tuned more precisely to the key that they would be played in. Bach was showing off a new technology where instead of precise tuning, the tuning was warped just enough that you could play in any key without retuning.

So a modern piano would actually be more faithful to the sound Bach was intending than an authentic Bach-era instrument that wasn't even-tempered.

Comment Re:Why does Microsoft even need a browser? (Score 1) 317

What do you do when you've created lots of GUI interfaces for novice users based on your web browser and that web browser isn't there anymore?

I don't. People who wrote apps that assumed that I was running IE or Flash have literally lost big-ticket business from me because I don't run IE and wouldn't trust it within 100 miles of my money.

I'd feel sorry for all those people who built IE6 web apps, except, well, no. I don't feel sorry for them. I was there when they did it and I warned them it was a bad idea to lock yourself into a monocultural world even then.

Comment Re:Not sure about that (Score 2) 274

English and German are actually very interesting languages to compare. They are historically much closer than many people realise. If you ever have the chance to study some Middle English or go see a play by Chaucer (or anything else that dates from before "the great vowel shift") performed with the pronunciation of that time the similarities suddenly become glaringly obvious. You'll start noticing them as well in modern versions of both languages.
But these languages have evolved in very different directions since that time. German has a big emphasis on a very formalized grammar and on compounding, whereas English has evolved with a simpler grammar and greater emphasis on a larger and more complex vocabulary with more subtle differences in meaning. This is also strongly related to (actual or perceived) cultural differences between native speakers of both languages.

I love studying languages and particularly language change and currently speak 5 different languages with varying degrees of fluency (Germanic, Romanic and Slavic languages) and find it a very enriching experience.

NewSpeak was predicated on the idea that your language controls your thoughts. It's true, but only do a degree, which is how NewSpeak-minded people managed to make "special" or "challenged" an insult. Then again, the English word "nice" has flip-flopped several times without artificial assistance.

German is in many ways the hardest language for me because a lot of the old words took on meanings in very different directions. A classic example is let/lassen. "Ich lasse mein Haar schneiden" doesn't literally mean "l let my hair be cut", although presumably it was a voluntary thing. However, the more precise translation would be "I have my hair cut", meaning, effectively that instead of permitting it to be done, I've ordered it to be done.

Actually, words are only part of it. The intonation that you use to ask a question in Russian sounds to an American like the other person is about to commit assault.

Comment Re:I've seen worse... (Score 1) 59

I've seen worse on paperbacks. Baen is famous for their bad covers, though the non-US ones are far, far worse. This, for instance.

Yep. Darrell Sweet's stereotypical covers were stiffly posed and had a certain aura that some of the characters could benefit from seeing a dermatologist.

I don't even want to THINK of what the average cover for a bodice-ripper featuring Highlanders, Lords, cowboys or werewolves is like (other than basically all alike).

Comment Re:Why does Microsoft even need a browser? (Score 2) 317

I don't understand why Microsoft wants to make a browser so badly. The consumer world has moved on to Firefox and Chrome and Safari and this is propogating through the enterprise world now.

What is the business case for having your own browser? So that bing can be the default search engine?

Well Duh. In Windows, the browser must be (squeaky Ballmer voice) "an Integral part of the Windows Operating System".

Because that works so much better than OS's like Linux and MacOS where the browser is a mere application program.

Comment Re:This sucks. (Score 1) 299

Go far enough down that path and you end up handling snakes in church.

Most people realize that God isn't going to protect them against things that they can protect themselves against.

Killing, however, is a one-way street, whether it's of self or others. God both can kill and resurrect - at least so we're told. People are only half that capable, as Gandalf once noted.

Comment Re:This sucks. (Score 4, Interesting) 299

It does. Suicide is a sin. That's why they would be against it.

Suicide is never directly named a sin in the Bible. In fact, King Saul committed suicide.

Theologically speaking, however, suicide is considered arrogating the right of God to determine when and how you will meet your end and putting oneself on a plane with God is considered at least one deadly sin (Pride).

Which is why we have good Christian people demonstrating for the right to forcibly hold vegetative people alive even when they would not be able to live without artificial assistance and are likely enduring at best a living Hell, because "life" and "living" are 2 different things.

Then again, many of these self-same good Christian people have absolutely no problem with a Death Penalty, even though it removes even the slimmest chance that the person so convicted might wake up one day 50 years hence and repent. Or for that matter, be exonerated.

Comment Re:This sucks. (Score 4, Insightful) 299

He wrote stories that were witty, entertaining - and full of knives.

The essence of Terry Pratchett can be summed up in one of his more frequent observations: that in the eyes of society, living in a vermin-infested slum practically makes you a criminal, but own a whole neighborhood of them and you're a pillar of the community.

Slashdot Top Deals

All seems condemned in the long run to approximate a state akin to Gaussian noise. -- James Martin

Working...