The people I worked for were just as greedy and treated their workers just as shitty as Walmart or any of the big box stores. There is nothing inherently noble or morally superior about being a small business on Main Street.
This is a terrible collision of logic and statistics that presents a view which is technically correct but misleading in almost every meaningful way when seen in the context of history. You're saying that because small businesses (referring to them as Mom and Pop stores is definitely over-romanticizing) are made of the same greedy people as big businesses and because they are businesses, they will treat their workers just as poorly. To reduce: A is always true and B is always true, therefore C is possible possible, therefore we should assume that C is always true.
It doesn't work like that. You only have to do a little research to see what hideous working conditions big businesses create. Walmart is a poster child for this, but take a look at Amazon's shipping facilities or Nike's assembly lines. The razor thin profit margin, the distance between the decision makers and the workers, the relentless need to please the shareholders: these are all terrifyingly dehumanizing elements of big business, and it shows. Small business has some of these pressures too, but at least your boss has to look you in the face when he's an asshole; that's a powerful motivator.
I'll bring my anecdotal evidence in last because it's probably the least significant, but yes, I've had a dozen or so jobs for both local businesses and national enterprises. I can say with absolute certainty: It's not even just a slight difference in management style, flexibility, pay, work environment, and good old-fashioned giving-a-shit: It's bloody night and day! When the owner of the company you work for sees you every day, collaborates with you in person, buys drinks, plays D&D, etc, I guarantee that you are treated better than any employee at WalMart.
The actual complaint is about displaying accurate time remaining to complete the task, which really has nothing to do with the display of the progress bar.
Give THIS man some upward moderation. This is a very significant point; perhaps our frustration with progress bars comes from misinterpreting what they actually represent. Personally I've never found poor time estimates as infuriating as progress bars whose displays don't actually correspond to the amount of stuff completed. Especially those ones where the same bar fills up multiple times, thereby giving you NO indication at all of how complete the process actually is. At that point, the bar is really just a variation on the hourglass or spinning wheel.
Windows 8 is fine, its pretty fast, and with one simple third party UI extension is actually usable.
Yup Classic Shell is the ticket. I've been using it for most of my clients now and nobody's missed Metro even a little bit. Now if we could just get an Office 2013 color scheme that doesn't make your eyes bleed...
Uh, I'm pretty sure that's the most misogynist thing I've read at Slashdot, ever.
You must have missed this thread.
It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.