I live in a rural area (Sierra Foothills of California). I chose to live there because I don't like high density housing and the problems related to it. With this "nice place to live" I also have no sewer (but have septic system), no public water (but have a well and you can't tell the difference except I don't get a water bill) and slow internet.
Until recent, my choices were dial up modem and satellite internet (a ripoff at $119/month with imposed FCC "Fair Access Policy".) FAP ensures you really can't stream video or use internet radio for any period of time. Else, if very small data download limits are exceeded, you're reduced to something near dialup modem speed.
Recently, there are a few companies that have installed various forms of wireless internet services. I'm paying $59/month for 1.2 megabit (maximum) download using a 900 mHz. "Motorola Canopy" system. That's the fastest available out here.
DSL would seem like lightening speed.
The problem is that cable companies have to run a relatively long length of cable to "maybe" connect a couple of users. It's just not cost effective for them to do so. Unless wireless speeds rapidly increase or until there's an available means to superimpose internet signals on the power mains, this is likely what I'm going to be stuck with. Cellphone reception is also sketchy here.
I really don't believe I have a "right to high speed internet". Rural living has it's pros and cons.
I've made my own choice and I'm happy with it.