Well thank you Mr Gates for being so sure normal people couldn't use high speeds to advantage - what if two kids are watching YouTube in 1080p, another person is using Netflix, and then someone fires up a PS4? I just got one the other day and wanted to play two game demos - over *2GB* each thank you very much. I had to play the next day because *I* don't have 2GB fiber...

Plus we all know that 2GB is shared so it's almost always going to be a percentage of the rating speed. Might as well be a percentage of a much higher number.

I do have a number of neighbors around me I know pretty well, that I say hi to - when I see them.

But I don't see them every day. In winter you may not see them for some time because people stay inside mostly.

Even a close community around you is no replacement for someone that checks on you daily.

What do you think society is going to be like when so many of the people not having kids get older? It's going to look like this, where you hire services to check in on you regularly and make sure you are not dead or needing help...

Even as the population gets more dispersed, there's a need for things like this so family who lives far away can still make sure parents are OK.

All we have to do is nothing. The sanctions are working, it's greatly slowing progress they are making to obtaining nuclear weapons.

If we lift the sanctions, we CANNOT restore them (the Iranians have said repeatedly it's absurd to think we could). They will absolutely have a nuclear weapon inside a year, probably much sooner.

The real assholes are the people like you willing to put the world to the torch because of your imaginary fears of invading Iran, which no-one wants to do. It makes no sense because what do you invade? The people are generally friendly to the U.S., it's only the rulers that are not - and they will use the entire populace as a human shield (that is also incidentally why they rightfully think they can use nuclear weapons against enemies without similar reprisals).

If the sanctions are lifted and millions die I hope you have the decency to at least feel a tiny bit guilty.... but then people like you so often rationalize all repercussions of your mistakes away.

Diplomacy, old definition:

"The art of saying 'Nice Doggy' until you can find a rock". - Will Rodgers

New definition:

"The art of handing rocks over to the doggy until it can bury you, while hoping that it is nice".

For point (A), they story made it sound like they were replaced overnight. I'm just wondering how that happens for any IT job... there's always some knowledge transfer that needs to be done.

For point (B), I'm saying that you cannot trust the company period. Some are saying what Disney did may well be illegal - doesn't matter to the people who were fired, because they need something to live on now. Never assume a company will follow the law, or cares about you whatsoever. In some cases they might, mind you, it's just that you should never assume that.

Oh, you'll wake up when it works

Well, if it works well all it will mean Windows gets some of the exploding Mac app market, a breath of fresh air in the stagnating Windows application space (for everything but games that is).

Apple is sort of phasing out Macs anyways, aren't they

You must be thinking of the slumping PC market.

Apple doesn't talk about Macs much but they are the sleeper hit, they keep growing in sales (unlike Windows PC) and Apple spends a lot of effort developing new macs.

Retina 5k iMac, perhaps you've heard of it.

Some of these folks were literally flown in the day before to take over the exact same job I was doing,

A) What were you doing you could be replaced that easily?!

B) Companies can drop you any time, out of nowhere. Keep some savings, and keep skills up so that if you need another job, you can find one... it's really easy at larger companies to drift into something that lasts years, if not endlessly. Don't let such things trap you.

I actually meant sub-orbital, typo. I referred to that later but it was absolutely confusing. Sorry about that.

It looks like in fact Microsoft is providing some kind of middle layer which provides much of the iOS framework libraries, they are calling it "Islandwood". Couldn't find details beyond that though.

It doesn't mean much to me that a game was ported with minimal effort since that would mostly be using OpenGL and the like.

From past systems like this, I think it would mean that you can technically use Objective-C code, just not any of the system frameworks... but that would be a pretty huge limitation if so, and involve a ton of re-work for anything existing.

I don't know why companies get so exited around being able to re-use a subset of business logic, and nothing else.... get a rules engine people!

The maximum donation is just $10k? They should have a $100k plus "I get to go into orbit" tier.

In fact if they were smart they would be talking about developing a really nice sub-orbital vehicle expressly for the purpose of tourism - huge viewing ports (with the new transparent aluminum of course!), dedicated to people really being able to see the globe.

Otherwise why should I think these guys can compete against SpaceX?

How much longer can a site that's largely based around the same handful of tired old memes remain relevant?

Well it all depends on how much longer Florida is around.

It is actually a lot better, because it's much better you may get nothing for your money.

When there are "protections" in place not only do a lot of things not happen because they cannot offer an "appropriate" level of guarantee, but also many times that which is guaranteed is not delivered on for one obscure legal reason or another.

I'd rather have the exception that something may fail than a fake promise I'll be re-embursed if it fails.

If I really want a share of the business, nothing stops me from going to them directly and offering that.

The problem is that that Kickstarter is really nothing more than distributed venture capital. Except that normal venture capital gives you a share of the company or future profits.

Here's a thought - what if that is OK? What if someone is OK being a venture capitalist whose only return is to possibly get a cool product they would like to see exist?

I think the real "problem" if there is one, is people who think of Kickstarter as a store instead of venture capital with product as a return.

All you get is a promise for a future product.

You don't get that; you get a promise they will *try to create* the product. The work Kickstarter has done in terms of validation and required disclosure is to try and make it as clear as possible, how likely that promise is to be kept.

discontent among users about failed projects

Those users can go take a flying leap as far as I'm concerned. I think there are enough people that understand what Kickstarter is, that it will continue to do well.

treats it as such by letting "investors" buy "shares" of the companies seeking funding thus making it obvious that they are also buying all the risk that comes with that

Sorry but I wouldn't touch that nebulous piece of crap with a ten foot pole. What Kickstarter is now is pretty clear I think, at this point everyone knows Kickstarters can fail, so they know there is risk. The disclosure items at the bottom give a good amount of information to fairly evaluate that risk.