Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:No comparison to ACA (Score 1) 634

No. It's currently providing free health care to everyone who is within the NHS's remits. The quality of care however is being degraded, for ideological reasons. That is the issue. I'm going to make the assumption, you're not a UK resident (well frankly it's obvious). An ageing population is a minor factor, nothing more. The simple fact is funding has been reduced, and is nowhere near in line with the rate of inflation. Therefore, more is being expected with less capital. Which has created a massive strain on the system. The political will for a proper, well resourced, nationalised health service no longer exists unfortunately.

Comment Re:Could root cause be the UK's immigration system (Score 1) 634

From what I have heard, UK has been getting a flood of immigrants who want nothing more than to live on the UK's generous welfare system.

The non-productive immigrants are totally draining the system.

I challenge you to find a source for that, I dare you. No, wait, I double dare you! Ironically, immigrants subsides benefits for the rest of the rest of the UK. http://niesr.ac.uk/blog/migrants-benefits-and-public-services-what-does-new-research-evidence-tell-us

Comment No comparison to ACA (Score 4, Informative) 634

The NHS is currently underfunded, just now the government in charge would love to abolish the NHS purely for ideological reasons. Since the global recession, politics in the UK has been fought over the issues of, public spending cuts, cost of living, the welfare state, immigration; the NHS has been shunned to the side and because of this has allowed funding to minimized. A (phony) promise was made by the government back in 2009 to protect NHS spending, an increase in spending was in fact claimed but the truth is polarising.

It's privatisation in the back door, under fund it, make it under perform, all of a sudden privatisation becomes an easy argument to make.

Comment Stupid question (Score 1) 168

Google just need the data which users give away when using Android. All those searches, GPS data, emails, whatever else users are subconsciously giving away so Google can turn every user in to a product to sell to advertisers. As mobile becomes more and more prominent, Google is going to have to have rely more on Android to bring in revenue. Any plans which could negatively effect their market share is completely out of the question.

One day Android will lose its market share and it'll be the first sign in the fall of Google ad business.

Comment Having followed all the leaks (Score 5, Interesting) 301

Is there anything real terrorists didn't know before that they know now? It is in the public domain the laws like The Patriot Act means the American government can go to Google and ask for the emails from whatever account they want. Of course they are going be using services out with America and her allies control. All these leaks have shown is the general public is the real enemy of the state.

Submission + - Britain's MI5 head says Edward Snowden leaks are 'gift' to terrorists (telegraph.co.uk) 1

An anonymous reader writes: The Telegraph reports, "Oliver Robbins said the Edward Snowden revelations could lead “directly to widespread loss of life” and “threaten the internal stability of the UK”. Andrew Parker, the new head of MI5, used his first speech to launch a scathing attack on the leaks warning they had “gifted” the terrorists the ability to attack “at will”. He said revealing intelligence techniques had given fanatics the advantage that allowed them to evade detection. David Cameron, the Prime Minister, backed the comments. ... Sir Malcolm Rifkind, chairman of the parliamentary body which oversees the spy agencies, said leaks had been "damaging". He said the intelligence agencies should be trusted to operate in secret because they are not "political tools" of repression like security services in Russia and China. Sir Malcolm, chairman of the Intelligence and Security Committee, told The Daily Telegraph: "When we know that Snowden has over 50,000 classified documents relevant to UK interests the idea that he or others would be able identify which are damaging to national security is naive. "Even knowing the technology that is available to GCHQ or MI5 or MI6 is valuable. Some of these terrorists are very, very smart. It's not like the old days when communication could only be by letter or telephone call."" — More at the Express and the BBC.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.

Working...