Comment Re:There is (Score 1) 674
Only one way to block BitTorrent.
There, fixed that for you.
Only one way to block BitTorrent.
There, fixed that for you.
Probably due to fragile egos about not being real scientists.
Yeah, because "Peace" and "Literature" are both much more scientific than Economics. It also doesn't seem to bother the judges from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, who choose the winners in the fields of Chemistry, Physics, and.. err.. Economics. How about that.
Fastest rising
1. wer kennt wen -- social networking site (general)
2. juegos -- no freaking idea (no, I will not google it!)
3. facebook
4. schüler vz -- social networking site (schoolkids)
5. studi vz -- social networking site (students)
6. jappy -- social networking site (general)
7. youtube
8. yasni -- person search engine
9. obama -- a very tanned man (thanks, Berlusconi!)
10. euro 2008
Most Popular
1. ebay
2. youtube
3. wetter -- weather
4. gmx -- E-mail provider
5. google
6. video
7. wikipedia
8. web.de -- E-mail provider
9. bild -- German tabloid
10. telefonbuch -- telephone book
Also, Austria
Fastest rising
1. teilchenbeschleuniger -- LHC
2. gina lisa -- contestant on Germany's next top model
3. peking 2008
4. euro 08
5. barack obama
6. schülerVZ
7. jÃrg haider -- Austrian right-wing pollie who died in a car crash, drunk off his nut, and was later discovered to be gay.
8. iphone
9. heath ledger
10. wahlkabine -- voting booth
Austrian most popular
1. youtube
2. wetter
3. google
4. orf -- Austrian TV Station
5. ebay
6. wikipedia
7. herold -- Austrian Yellow Pages
8. routenplaner -- route planner
9. immobilien -- houses/property
10. gmx
I notice that several countries have the term "google" in their top 10 google searches. WTF? Who goes to google and then types in "google"?
It is not the stuff we eat. It is the stuff our food eats
If we grow less stuff-to-eat so that we can grow more stuff-to-burn it comes out to the same thing, doesn't it?
I think the OP's point is that the South American version uses existing waste products rather than changing the production mix to produce more, well.. waste products.
Given the quality of American beer, I'm surprised they drank half of it before throwing it away.
If we were talking about something being sold, product differentiation would be one means of attempting to achieve some form of price discrimination.(1)
That part of the equation doesn't apply here (though it will to any of the car-analogies cropping up), but product differentiation is still a recognised way to build brand loyalty by creating (perceived) differences and thereby value.
People don't use Firefox and think "Gee, isn't Google great?" – that's the (a) reason for Chrome.
A further reason is that having R&D in your own company can have positive synergies (apologies for the buzzword, but it applies here) with other projects, which don't occur from simply supporting external development.
Those are mid-to-long-term strategic considerations, while combining the projects simply to save money would be rather more a short-term oriented decision. Which isn't necessarily a criticism.
(1) Price discrimination is the concept of charging each buyer the full extent of what he is willing to pay for a good, rather than the same price as everyone else. For example, school-children don't have much money to pay for cinema tickets, and wouldn't come if they had to pay adult prices. They're still willing to pay more than the costs they incur, though, so the cinema operators increase their profits by charging them less. You'll see it all around if you pay attention.
so (SchÃuble) tries to push the law through this way.
Where it will, again, be voted down. Democracy at work – yay!
Next story!
You do, if you've paid for the right to graze 10,000 sheep there. If the land can handle 20,000 sheep, and the land owner has sold these grazing rights thrice, who is at fault?
If I could give you some of the positive moderation from my comment, I would, but I'm afraid your quality answer will remain at Score: 1.
Thanks anyway! I appreciated the response
Mod parent up. It's been known since 2005 that Heilmann worked for the Stasi. The Left (his political party) even had a vote about whether to keep him or not when the issue arose; relatively obviously, the voted to keep him.
It probably won't stop the ill-informed
Being "left" or "right" has nothing to do with whether you're fascist or not. Fascism is an expression of total authoritarianism, which it is perfectly possible to combine with an attitude of socialism. They're two separate axes on the political compass.
Note that on the above chart, Dr. Angela Merkel (current German chancellor) is, in fact, "right". She's just not as right as most other Western leaders, leading to the impression that she is, in fact, "left".
Lutz Heilmann is even further left (his Party is called "The Left"), and on the Authoritarian/Libertarian scale doubtlessly up nice and high.
According to the EU, the grant would not help Thomson gain any market power because rivals should also keep up their investment in research and development. EU rules forbid governments granting money to companies if that would give them an unfair advantage over competitors. (IHT)France on Tuesday won EU approval to give euro99 million (US$152 million) to several companies hoping to build a European rival to U.S. search giant Google Inc.
The European Commission said it could allow the government to fund French technology group Thomson SA and 22 other companies working on the QUAERO multimedia search project because the potential benefits to European research would outweigh any gain Thomson would win over rivals.
Thomson hopes the research will help it offer better Internet protocol distribution technology to deliver television programs or films online.
It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.