Still cheaper than a replicator if you end up printing less than 19 spools' worth of stuff over the life of the printer.

Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.

With Kodos, the whole comments section would be filled only with Simpsons quotes.

"Ultrasmall" is not a word.

"Ultra-small" or "ultra small" are better, but sound way too stupid.

"Extremely small", "smallest yet" are better alternatives.

Yes it is. Not because of availability, but other issues like allergies or compromised immune systems.

And those unfortunate enough not to be able to be vaccinated.

You're the one making outrageous claims, so don't expect people to believe you unless you have proof to show.

Just because a random guy publishes a list with no explanation doesn't mean he's right.

How about a reputable citation?

[Citation Needed]

Up until recently, OS X severely lagged behind Windows in several security features. IIRC, it took Mavericks to bring it up to feature parity (or close). There is nothing about OS X that makes it inherently more secure than Windows.

As for the linked article, moving to a "closed" OS is the cheap and lazy way to protect against some things. The same has long been done on Windows, by the more paranoid admins. It does not solve any underlying issues - if anything, incentives to actively seek out issues are reduced.

More popular OS gets more attention from exploit and virus coders. News at 11.

Upgrade to 7 or 8 and enjoy a little better performance. Not magically better, but better.

Those Core i7s are using exactly as much power idling as a Core i3, most likely.

7 runs far better than Vista in limited RAM. Specifically, 7 avoids keeping copies of VRAM contents in main RAM, whenever possible, freeing up room for other stuff.
8 had some more unspecified changes made (specifically due to Windows Phone and Windows RT) to the kernel to help contain memory usage further.

Congratulations for presenting "proof" that doesn't prove anything. User-perceived sluggish behavior is mostly due to slow hard drives not loading stuff quickly enough. 4GB of RAM is more than enough for anything casual (except newer games - but it's silly to run those on a laptop) and the majority of productivity software.

That's why only high-end Xeons support multi-processor setups.

Yeah, avoid OS X at all costs.

Holy shit.

I mean, it's general knowledge that iTunes for Windows is most likely the worst piece of software ever written... But what you describe takes it to a whole new level of stupidity.

Hell, it almost makes it sound like they're trying to slow down Windows on purpose...