Comment Re:Not a new idea (Score 1) 124
They're not claiming it's a new idea, they're saying that such tubes are structurally sound for the purpose.
They're not claiming it's a new idea, they're saying that such tubes are structurally sound for the purpose.
Before you can perfect editing the genome without side effects you are going to mess things up. That is the ethical dilemma that needs to be answered who do you practice on.
Certainly! But our* corporations have a pretty crappy record of balancing ethics and profits.
* Humankind's. No country or race has any claim to superior ethical behavior.
I don't think a resolution passed by an NGO or a couple of research groups are going to stop this. There's too much profit potential for successful edits. What would a parent pay to have a child that was free of a genetic defect? Blonde hair and blue eyes? Etc...
It's a McDonald's Styrofoam cup for me, but I refill the same one for days on end.
And fuck beta
I've learned more about a topic from the comments than I ever have from TFA. Take away the current comment functionality and I'll have to start slumming at reddit.
Fuck Beta!
Hell, get your ham licence and put up a 100' tower. They cannot regulate amateur radio antenna installations, either.
See subject
Says the AC
Except for the vast orders of magnitude difference in which speed at which the two move, you're almost correct.
Always draw your curves, then plot your reading.