Wouldn't it be great if you could just buy a 40 - 60 inch 1080p computer monitor for some fraction of the cost of the complete PC? (... and then just swap out or modify the connect media PC as necessary)
I guess the question that comes to my mind is: Why would anyone want to run a LAMP stack on a relatively expensive tablet, when there are cheaper and more suitable low-power options available?
... it is the effects caused by the impact of the bullets that kill people.
How many countries can you name that have governments that are not? ("corrupt and dangerous")
that's killing him.
My response was to the question of this kind of enhancement being down on-the-fly, in a television 'set'.
Obviously, bringing in additional data to supplement that which was present in the originally released video could provide true enhancement, but that is a different case entirely.
All you can really do is interpolation in time and between existing pixels, followed by smoothing and low pass filtering. You can't add any real data that isn't there to begin with, and DVD's, with their mpeg compression, only have so much information to begin with. Smoothing and interpolation of a video that has already had to undergo restoration to undo compression, just to bring it up to standard resolution, will never look like a true high definition video stream, no matter what you do.
Actually, Coulombs is a measure of charge, not energy. The energy (in Joules) stored in a capacitor is 1/2 CV^2. Stated another way, the amount of energy stored in joules is equal to one half the number of coulombs of charge times the voltage across the capacitance. But otherwise, your statement about the total charge being equal to the integral of the current over time (which can be construed as a count of electrons moved... 1 Coulomb = 6.241 x 10^18 electrons worth of charge ; 1 amp of current = 1 Coulomb/sec)
Ya'll hear about the geometer who went to the beach to catch some rays and became a tangent ?
