Comment All your genes are belong to us! (Score 3, Insightful) 333
One problem there - Humans contain the DNA for producing morphine. It works so well precisely because out body already uses it to regulate our natural pain response.
This is the same asshole who buys a pretty little property out in the countryside, and then after a year or two launches a farm practices complaint to shut down the neighbouring farms (which have only been there for two hundred years) because they smell like farms.
Then he shows up in town council explaining that only sociopaths raise farm animals.
What an incredible self-interest bullshit configurator this man possesses.
Get the fuck off my moral lawn.
The only assumption you should be making is that nothing is secure.
I'll file that right beside "In the beginning, God created the universe, and it was good."
In tech today if you dont speak english your dead in the water.
Emphasis on the word "speak".
It's a statement of fact, and everyone - including you and me - is terrible at programming.
Simply not true, unless you believe that non-terrible code requires God himself to reach down and personally touch type.
I heard a bit of CBC episode recently, where a breathing consultant by the name of James Chambers argues that humans are terrible at breathing, and that with proper training (this takes about a year), we're almost competent (and then flowers bloom everywhere in an orchestral swell).
One thing I will say is that a programmer is only as good as the API he or she programs against. In the spirit of Bill Maher, I hereby announce a New Rule: Garbage under, garbage above.
Most of the programmers with legendary reputations for writing correct systems have worked at (or fairly close to) the bare metal (or some POSIX-ratified virtual bare metal with extra starch).
Humans actually suck at just about everything. Programming is not especially special (modulo rampant innumeracy). All the greats in any discipline recognize and work within their personal limitations.
It's not constructive to become so bitter that you give up, or delegate the hard work to a tool that can only take you so far (perhaps less far than you wish to go).
Just the other day I listened to this Econtalk episode from six months back: Joshua Angrist on Econometrics and Causation
For the entire episode, Russ Roberts is trying to play the same pessimism card, effectively implying that humans suck at everything.
Joshua Angrist is having none of it. He directly refutes the posture of excessive pessimism time and again. It's a joy to hear Russ taking one on the chin for a change.
Now we just need an enterprising academic to self-subscribe to a personal mission to save us all from ourselves to come along and wrap up the whole of econometrics into a protective cocoon inside of which many of the basic errors simply can not be made.
Brave new world? Or cult of pessimism?
In my corner of the world, hard-baked optimists don't write unthinking rants anchored on assertions prefaced with "statement of fact". Wits on dial tone predicts no good thing.
"I've seen it. It's rubbish." -- Marvin the Paranoid Android