Your example of Jewish bakery owners is not part of the current conversation.
Then why did you mention it in your reply? What is this mysterious "conversation" you reference, anyway? Seriously, stop pointing your snooty nose so high up in the air and you may actually engage with other people who are trying to discuss things rationally.
Congratulations, you're an idiot. There's a difference between refusing to serve someone because they're asking for a product you don't sell and refusing to serve them because they're Christian, or Muslim, or black, or gay.
No, you're just in denial because I made a point you don't have an answer for. If you ask the kosher bakery for rolls decorated with a traditional Jewish symbol or Hebrew letter, they might be happy to comply. But if you ask for rolls decorated with a cross, they have objections because they disagree with your religion.
If heterosexual wedding planners ask a Christian cake decorator for a wedding cake topped with husband/wife figures, the bakery is happy to comply. If a gay couple ask for husband/husband wedding topper, the baker declines and asks them to contact a different bakery.
You tell me, what's the difference, genius? (And why do you hate Jewish small business owners and want to see them bankrupted because of their religion?)
as a real secret any more, if there ever was. If the "secret" is based on scientific research, it's been published and is reproducible and all the relevant people already know about it.
Nope, not true. I have a friend with a Physics Ph.D. who does nuclear weapons related research at LANL. Her work is read only by fellow DoD scientists and certainly is not published in public journals.
This is actual law in many places around the world,
Which sucks, but is entirely irrelevant in the US.
OK, fair enough to some extent, I agree that people clamoring for sharia law and/or jihad isn't a real threat as long as individuals never act on their barbarous ideology (unfortunately many individuals do), and as long as Muslims don't become the majority locally, regionally, or nationally (they have in some areas here, and regionally/nationally elsewhere in the world). A pretty good litmus test for how the progression to sharia is going would be to walk through a neighborhood wearing a yarmulke and see how you are treated. That's not safe in some neighborhoods of Paris these days, although I have a vague understanding that it's politically incorrect for me to point that out. It's weird how Jew-hatred goes in and out of vogue among the self-designated intelligentsia of Western culture; currently it's "in".
and it's amazing to see liberal non-Muslims "see no evil, hear no evil" etc. when they fail to admit sharia is creeping onto their own turf.
Or it could be that "creeping onto their own turf" is utter bullshit fear mongering.
One of us is in denial about the obvious, that's for sure.
I vote for sideslash, then. Clearly your name is pejorative enough.
Aha, that is creative. I hadn't thought of it that way.
He who has but four and spends five has no need for a wallet.