If this is more of that "state's rights" bullshit, let me remind you once again: the original and most powerful argument both for and against state's rights was slavery.
What's wrong with states' rights? Personally I think any group of citizens in any nation should have the right to self-determination. Assuming they are not doing anything morally bankrupt (like slavery), I think pushing the power base down to the state level has several benefits:
1. oversight is easier, as the centers of power are shifted closer to the local level
2. people would have a greater stake in their government - it is a lot easier to interact with your state officials than your reps in Washington
3. it makes it much easier to vote with you feet if the state you live in is politically intolerable (compared to having to move out of the US entirely)
4. the US is politically polarized with most states strongly red or strongly blue, if the states had more authority they could really unleash their own respective philosophies
Personally I think a number of states (California for example) would be well-suited to leave the Union entirely, and master their own destiny. Oh and it _would_ be nice if the US played well with the international community
So, the area from Boston to Washington DC counts as one metro area then?
No, definitely not. Boston to DC is a far larger area than the bay area. It takes around 7+ hours to drive from DC to Boston (I've done this drive many times). In 1 hour, you can drive from San Jose, through Oakland, and into San Francisco. So yes, it can count as the same metro area. Note that these drive times assume traffic is light.
A rational approach would be to limit regulaiton like this to: * Where there's an actual crisis
Climate Change? Seems like a fairly significant impending crisis to me. Why is it that trusting the private sector over the government, and lack of long-term planning for the future, seem to go hand-in-hand?
Corporations have no power in a free market, only the consumers do.
That is frighteningly optimistic. Any truly free market naturally gravitates toward a plutocracy of monopolies, as companies continually get bigger and buy each other out unchecked (see Big Oil, Big Media, Big Telecom, etc). Then what power do consumers have? We might a government that can provide and enforce regulation to prevent this.
"What if" is a trademark of Hewlett Packard, so stop using it in your sentences without permission, or risk being sued.