Agree completely and very informative.

Would like to add that it's very a poor idea in the first place to use debit cards for those types of transactions rather than a credit card.

Most of their problem was that using a cutting torch to open a hole for the insertion of the water. The heat of the torch in the closed space of the safe melted or burned everything inside.

Also, Mythbusters is almost going to show a successful criminal approach - they are too reliant on the cooperation of law enforcement. The only successful ones they show are ones that are too impractical.

Neither do people in other western countries.

George, no amount of astroturfing is going to convince anyone that the prequels were good or even tolerable. You should have at least hired someone who knew who to write passable dialog.

You were good when you first started off, but now you've been blinded by your own success.

That's not the reason. Millennials tend to prefer living in-town rather than out in the suburbs.

Nature is a scientific journal - not just a magazine. If you didn't know that, you shouldn't be posting on threads such as these.

The rise of the Dollar has had a hand in lowering oil prices.

Actually, the reason to take them alive would be to gather information about their network.

Boston was also able to capture one of their terrorists alive which is much more valuable to intelligence agencies.

That's actually not good news. They were much more valuable alive.

But you won't get that choice if the channels that you like are no longer available.

Remember, the reason that reality shows have taken over is because of the "race to the bottom" approach that you're advocating.

IMDB has algorithms to lessen or even disregard votes of 10's and 1's. IMDB also looks at the voter's history to apply the appropriate weight.

You also left out that many newer films also get many people rating it a "1", just because they don't like the franchise or an actor.

Not all movies shown in American theaters are made by "hollywood".

Then why not do the actual calculations using a more suitable wooden structure like a house?

Again, if you read my original post, I stated explicitly that I'm not endorsing the article, just that using a chair as a benchmark to debunk it is really stupid.

Exactly - the investigators on the CSI tv series have been able to do this for years so I don't know why this is news.. All they have to do to read a person's drivers license from a 640x480 security camera image taken from 200 meters away in poor light is to ask the image processing dude to "enhance image".