Want to be an atheist? That's perfectly acceptable. It's as acceptable and reasonable as someone choosing to be religious. But there's no need to revise history and make unfounded claims in order to convince yourself that you're in the right and somehow enlightened.
Bollocks. The burden of proof is to prove that god exists. As a "rational agnostic" there is not an equal likelyhood of God existing or not existing. That simply isn't true, since there is no evidence whatsoever to support the existence of God, every day that passes the probability of him existing fades to zero. And even worse he is no more likely to exist than any other crackpot ideas you can think of (Thetans, anyone?).
I agree that it is rational to be agnostic over atheistic, denying the possibility of something we cannot definitely prove is as irrational as believing it is definately true. But when the probability of god is so low that he is no more or less likely to exist than the flying spaghetti monster, the invisible intangible silent unicorn, or Russell's teapot, "rational agnosticism" tends towards very-nearly-atheism to such a point that it becomes a mere semantic difference.
I would imagine that the majority of racists are not the smug closed minded "just a faith in no god" morons you suggest, but very well informed "99.9%-no-agnostic-but-I-call-myself-atheist-it's-easier".
Consider this difference:
If someone proved categorically there was a God tomorrow, the majority of atheists would be eating humble pie and choosing a religion to join.
If someone proved the opposite beyond all doubt, ie. that no god can possibly exist, the vast majority of religious people would reject the evidence and carry on as if nothing happened.
As for the original point, I think it was Bertrand Russell who once said something relevant:
"A good man will do good deeds, whilst an evil man will do evil deeds. But for a good man to do evil deeds requires religion"
More good comes from modern religion than you can imagine.
War. Racism. Homophobia. Sexism. Indoctrination of children. Rejection of science/reason. Rejection of contraception leading to the spread of STDs.
So what's the good bit? It better be fucking massive.
Beyond that drugs don't have a constructive use in society. At best they're benign and at worst they cause a lot of damage to people not directly involved.
You could make same argument about sport, TV, video games, playing D&D or just about any primarily recreational activity when done to excess. Having a couple of spliffs or taking a pill or two at a club occasionally has been consistently proven not to be any more harmful in the long or short term than drinking alcohol.
Once again, the Bible was right.
No it wasn't. It got three events in roughly the right historical order (although actually most modern animals evolved a long time after all three had been created), if you look at it a certain way. In a book over a thousand pages long that is not impressive at all. Now I would be impressed by the biblical creation stories if god has spent the previous three weeks creating strange single celled creatures and burying fake skeletons to trick us into believing evolution. I still wouldn't believe it though.
Personally, I don't find this "evidence" to be particularly compeling, but then I'm no longer the blind faith in science type. Science will never prove anything conclusively because it's a game where they continually move the goal posts.
How can you have blind faith in science? The point of science is that it can be proven wrong and therefore does not require any faith. Wanting definite answers is something I can certainly sympathise with but choosing the Bible over science is not choosing the definite over the uncertain. It is choosing something which has already been proven wrong over something which has not been proven wrong yet.
The biggest problem with any Android phone is the terrible software it's saddled with. Some of the HTC devices look pretty nice, spec wise, but the OS on them is utter shit. And, no, openness doesn't make up for being shit.
Neither is prettiness but Apple seems to get away with it.
when the country is running through one of the most serious economic crises of its existence.
Technological investment seems like a pretty good way to encourage long term economic growth and stability to me. It sure beats paying people to do fuck all, like the rest of our unelected socialist dictator's retarded policies.
Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.