You are not thinking like a Corporation. Under Corporate logic, the test makes perfect sense.
If they can get this test adopted, then for children to be considered intelligent they must be able to score well on this this test.
Which means teachers must be able to teach students how to pass the tests.
Which means a huge market for textbooks and study aids will explode overnight as they will be the only means to make any of the test questions make sense.
And with plenty of copyright filings and a good, litigious law firm on retainer, all such materials will be created and sold exclusively by Pearson Education for many, many years to come.
It's a win/win for them. If they get the tests through, they strike gold. If they don't, they've already got a ton of gold from the Gates'.
The only realistic way Linux will explode is if Microsoft continues down the Windows 8 road and makes their OS completely unsuitable for use on Desktops, forcing OEMs to abandon it to avoid constant complaints and returns. With Linux being the only real desktop OS alternative on 3rd party hardware it would likely win out by default. But it's more likely the OEMs would instead adapt to the new version of Windows by adding touch screens or whatever else was needed so even that's unlikely.
Linux needs a lot of little things to happen to become a common desktop OS. Games support is a major one, but it's not something that could cause it all by itself even with an big time exclusive title.
What I do want to avoid is people getting addicted to nicotine through e-cigs and then either getting stuck with those or moving on to other tobacco products.
A. To most people who have never smoked, tobacco quite frankly tastes like shit. With the availability of numerous other flavors ranging from fruit flavors to desert flavos and even fish, few people who don't smoke are going to find tobacco flavors more appealing. And almost none of them are ever going to decide they'd prefer to smoke or chew actual tobacco over tailored flavors. B. Smoking cessation and nicotine delivery isn't the only use for ecigs. I know several diabetics and dieters who use ecigs with nicotine free eliquids to curb cravings for sweets and other junk food with great success.
but it's still harmful for you and it's costing you a lot of money, taxation or not.
It can cost a lot if you make it a hobby. But it doesn't have to cost a lot. A $80 Vamo kit (with 2 batteries and a charger), a $20 Protank and maybe $10 in replacement heads a month will cover the hardware costs for a fairly high performance. And a 30ml bottle of eliquid costs about $20 on the high end and will last most people about 2 weeks. As for it being harmful, It's almost certainly more harmful than not vaping but there's no concrete data showing it's any more harmful than breathing the air in any major city and a great deal of data showing it's far less harmful than smoking. There's a fine line to draw in order to help existing smokers transition to them (since they're evidently better than actual cigarettes) and discouraging non-smokers (especially teenagers) from trying them out. By painting the opposition as nutjobs, all you're doing is looking like a nutter yourself.
you do realize that ethylene glycol is the major (after water) component in Smoke/Fog Fluid right??
The main ingredient in Smoke/Fog fluid is Triethylene glycol, not ethylene glycol.
I'd much rather pay a few bucks more for internet and phone service to subsidize the roll out of broadband to country folk than have a pig farm 3 blocks away from my house.
Credit ... is the only enduring testimonial to man's confidence in man. -- James Blish