Comment Re:Doomsday Machine - Peace insurance. (Score 1) 638
What a strange thing it is to pursue total annihilation in the interest of world peace. Yet the horror of war is the greatest force for peace.
Seeing as how the nuclear weapons haven't been used since the first time(s), I fail to see how they can CAUSE these small conflicts.
I could see an argument that they facilitate lesser combat more readily because the conflicts CANNOT escalate, and therefore
the larger military force with nuclear weapons is more disposed to attack conventionally, knowing it cannot be overcome conventionally.
However, nuclear weapons also prevent the TYPE of warfare that they embody - TOTAL WAR. They stand as a warning against atrocity.
We could conceivably use nukes as retaliation against biological, chemical, or similar attacks from lesser non-nuclear rogue states.
No state would dare use WMD of any type in any capacity because of M.A.D. Of course, terrorists could be immune to M.A.D.
They could also be used in the case of an all-out invasion or similar major theater warfare, for example if India invaded Pakistan.
With such stakes, even the most hawkish generals are forced to reconcile their ambitions with the chance of worst case scenarios.
The nuclear genie is out the bottle, perhaps, but I would argue that we resealed the bottle in horror after we realized the ramifications.
The most dangerous nuclear weapons are the smallest ones. The less collateral damage, the more likely they'll be used.
The newest low-yield nuclear bunker busters would open the door to 'conventionalized' nuclear weapons worldwide.
Conventionalized nuclear war, now that is truly frightening. Thank god for the doomsday machine, it served its purpose, real or not.