Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Irresponsible (Score 1) 354

...or you could phrase it as the UK that had to preserve the independance of Canada by burning down the White House... ..or the UK that assisted with the development of codebreaking and radar so you could win against the Japanese ...or the UK that got the US started on jet and atomic weapon technology

etc etc.

Comment Re:Irresponsible (Score 1) 354

BTW, you're not anti gun, you're just against anyone but the government having guns. I'll bet you're all for Police, Military and agencies like the BLM having assault rifles and tanks....

No even in these cases we believe that gun use should be controlled and limited. Your average UK policeman does not carry a gun, although I accept he/she can call on backup which does. The military is only allowed to play with guns when the Prime Minister says so...

Comment Re:Who Cares? (Score 2) 354

Nobody is going to be able to create a massacre with a printed gun, they just aren't up to the task for a variety of reasons. It's also pretty unlikely that anyone is going to be murdered with one either. An accidental death, sure, but intentionally snuffing someone, not any time soon.

Why not for intentionally snuffing someone? As a murder weapon, a plastic gun has a lot of benefits - you can simply melt the gun after the event and therefore eliminate a major source of forensic evidence.

Comment Re:It's an interesting question (Score 1) 304

Google is not arbitrarily farming personal data, it is providing a link to an item that was in a local paper. The information in the local paper is a matter of public record. As you have stated yourself, local papers should be able to have searchable archives and these archives should exist for eternity in my humble opinion.

I am not of the opinion that people should be screwed forever, but if I vote for someone I definitely want to know his entire history for a lot longer than 6 years. Every side has a chance to mud-sling and it should be easy for people to fact check for themselves. If one side is mud-slinging I want to be able to find out for myself if the mud-slinging has a basis in fact or is an unsubstantiated allegation. There is an equal belief in America that people are allowed to get back on their feet after screwing up - its almost a badge of honour to have a failed business startup and the big question is whether they learned from their mistakes.

From browsing your comments, you seem to take an actively hostile and abusive, ad-hominem line in your arguments when someone has the temerity to disagree. I think this law will gain "mission creep" and is antithetical to the idea of the ability to easily access information that the Internet supports today.

Comment Re:It's an interesting question (Score 1) 304

The Gonzales case is exactly about the archives of a local newspaper being referenced by a search engine - it relates to a newspaper reference to a property auction due to Gonzales having financial difficulties in the past. It is basically saying that such archives are no longer searchable or indexable online.

What this can mean is that if you're about to enter politics, you can clean up your record before there is a public interest defence and then enter politics with a shiny clean record.

Slashdot Top Deals

"A car is just a big purse on wheels." -- Johanna Reynolds

Working...