You are not going to find anyyhing that does it all the best. You also cannot run more than one antivirus at a time. Well, you can but i will make hou wish you never thought of the idea. And no- malware bytes is not an antivirus.

You would be better served learning safe habbits and monitoring tech sites dealing with infections while not expecting a best product. Do this anyways if someone convinces you thay there is a best.

If they have an electric garage door opener, chances are someone can already get in withou this and with having to crack it. Most often all you need is a coat hanger or two.

Yes, a dog whistle where no one can hear it except the dogs- oh and the people making the claim. They can miraculously hear it and have all the details despite no hard evidence.

I know a guy who lost a tooth and could blow a whistle through it that sounded like the pass tone on a portable breathalizer test. But we had proof of that which is more that your theory.

Oh wait, i just referenced a tooth missing and tools a cop use. I must be thrwatening you or something. Perhaps you will get a DUI.

Don't nobody move or the nigger is gonna get it.

Gawd that's a great movie.

A hirer percentage of seated republicans voted for the civil right act than democeats. If senator Byrd was still alive, he would tell you all about it

And here, ladies and gentlemen, is the main reason i switched from being pro life to pro choice.

5 paragraphs to say nothing of importance with the intelectual honesty and incitefulness of a navel gazing 2 year old.i guess it takes all kinds to make the world an interesting place.

Silly boy. It was the same logical falllacy the AC used. Lack of evidence against is not evidence for.

Why doesn't it fit? What- outside of politics causes that to be the case?

I do not think you can answer those without ignoring some important things.

There are quite a few proofs out there that demonstrate 2+2=5. Google it and you will see.

Of course some have obvious errors but a few seem legit.

All they got to do is say they voted the amendment down because it was meaningless and not related to the bill. No exposing of anything other than the sillyness politicians employ thinking they can get one over someone else. Outside of the already convinced, it could actually backfire on them too.

There is also not a scintilla of evidence that my tiger repelling rock in my pocket does not work. I have never been attacked bt a tiger either.

All my maps are already flat. Even when folded..

Evenly divide a stick into 20 segments. Now turn it upside down so then numbers go from low to high in a top to bottom way. Now use this stick to gauge something like the amount left until a body of water spills over its banks. We can call this the flood stage and 15 would be less water than 5 would be. And the lower number you have, the more water.

Dude, i cannot tell what you are trying to say in regards to my post. It appears as if ws are in agreenent but who knows. Please, in the future, if you are replying to me, actually do it instead of pointing to some other reply to someonr else. It will make a lot mord sense to the both of us as well as anyone following our discusion who might have something insightful or informative to add.

That being said, all sorts of people have tried to weasle through government restriction imposed by the constituton. Usually, those people find out how wrong they are. Unfortunately, it likely isn't until after someone gets screwed first. The constitutional limits on government limit concepts in general and not specific items that existed. It not dated and irrelevant not is it a living document subject to reinterpretation as the AC mentioned.

I do think you are correct.