I'm guessing that this is not settled science (whatever that is) and that at most they have a model to justify their model.

As usual, the Democrats and the President are NOT part of the Washington establishment (that is to blame for this) and so this can't be blamed on them. They have campaigned against this (even last week). You should probably look to the Republicans to blame.

That means things will just keep getting warmer and humans are doing a poor job of slowing things down.

There is no such thing as a coincident. Need to bring in some outsiders to investigate.

I wonder what will happen when some big volcanoes spew ash over most of the planet and solar energy production can't keep up with demand and the old, reliable energy production is gone? It's not like that has every happened, well 1816 sure, but it won't happen again.

I was talking to a young, bright FBI agent last month and when I said that I was a software developer she said quite appropriately "aren't we all?"

I'm afraid that IT is becoming very much self serve and the few remaining Development/IT jobs are going to be very specialized and hardcore positions.

I guess this isn't exactly The Andromeda Strain (1969), by Michael Crichton, but it was my first thought.

Atheists can't readily be classified beyond not believing in a god. That single thing doesn't categorically lead to much else. I'm an atheist and I think abortions are pretty much murder. But then, I'm not necessarily against murder, especially in this case.

So why the heck can't they show his face in a story about facial recognition? Why the picture of a train? That has nothing to do with facial recognition! For all we know he has some incredibly unique face or maybe a tattoo across his forehead.