Comment Don't touch my packet! (Score 2, Funny) 125
I read the headline and assumed this would be another story about the TSA's screening procedures...
I read the headline and assumed this would be another story about the TSA's screening procedures...
I hate to be the guy who complains about the headline of a story... but a "web bug" is an image in a web page or HTML email that allows the site owner to track who has visited the page or read the email. This story has absolutely nothing to do with "web bugs". How about "browser bug" instead?
Why would a corporation care about a grieving widow, unless there was some sort of bad publicity to arise out of... oh dear.
The better corporations realize that money isn't made from getting a customer, but maintaining good customer relationships with current customers. In this economy, no one can afford to provide poor customer service. I hope Verizon changes its policy to deal with the deaths of its current customers.
This will take science. It will take art. It will take innovation. It will take ambition.
It will also take the realization that the leading causes of death in the USA are all preventable:
Source: http://proxychi.baremetal.com/csdp.org/research/1238.pdf
There's only so much a doctor can do to stop the damage if the patient is already physically in poor health.
The political issue at hand is this: Should the government allow people to make irrational decisions when the mistakes can be costly or deadly? There is a movement called "soft paternalism" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_paternalism) that basically argues that many people are making irrational decisions, so the government should gently nudge them into making rational ones. There are many books promoting this idea, including Nudge, The Paradox of Choice and Free Market Madness.
This sounds all nice and wonderful until you realize that it's ultimately politicians and bureaucrats that is deciding what is "rational" for a person to spend their money on -- like they're such great role models
I'll admit that my concept of our spending is probably skewed by intentionally misleading infographics and such, but this doesn't seem to jive with anything I've ever seen. Can someone explain how this is true, or point to something that does?
The cost of health care driving the US deficit and federal debt is actually old news:
http://www.iousa.com/ (30-minute version of the film film, highly engrossing)
http://www.pgpf.org/resources/PGPF_CitizensGuide_2009.pdf (Summary in PDF format)
I hate to interrupt a good old-fashioned witch-hunt, but AOL was instrumental in the creation of a little group called the Mozilla Foundation, transferring hardware and intellectual property to them and donating $2 million.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Foundation#History
So maybe they're not all bad.
The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood