With "smart" people ranging from type-A personalities, to high-functioning autistics, it's not surprising they wouldn't find one specific set of genes for intelligence. There is extreme variation in "smart", and even more for "academic achievement", where a complete idiot (for lack of a better term) willing to put in substantial effort, can perform just as well as a highly intelligent person without such motivation.

...and 4Mbps is still faster than dial-up today.

Review sites like Yelp and the sort will throw up every roadblock at any attempt by any court to de-anonymize a user.

Courts don't like being messed with. They try that a few times, and they'll eventually get smacked-down, hard.

In short, it's impossible to identify a poster

Bull.

Do you honestly think the stock room is like a door to narnia that has infinite space?

No, I simply think you would like to sell your merchandise, not give it a permanent home in your back room. Who buys it, and for what purpose, is completely irrelevant to that goal. I also don't think it's a war-crime that sometimes an item is going to be out-of-stock.

Clearly you never had to manage stock at a grocery store before..

Actually, yes. A small convenience store, which sold a decent selection of groceries.

Unscrupulous companies will sometimes engage in reverse-astroturfing, where they hire a bunch of folks to post bad reviews of their competitors.

That's called "libel" and it's been illegal forever.

Posting fake positive reviews is immoral, but legal. Posting fake negative reviews can get your ass hauled into court, and paying for every cent of damage your actions did to the target, multiplied by whatever factor the judge likes...

We told her she couldn't do that and was meant for families. So we started putting limit signs. She would then start sending in her kids to get more.

Who you MEANT for an item to be sold to is irrelevant. If I want to buy tampons to use as insulation in my walls, I don't expect an argument. It's not like the customers are the ones who set the prices on the items you're selling, YOU did that, and are complaining that it didn't work out quite the way you WANTED it to. You can try coupons, with lots of terms and conditions to put limits on such things, but at the end of the day, the best solution is just to price items properly. Hell, that's Walmart's slogan, and they're not exactly at a loss to get customers in the store, or having problems turning a profit.

After so much hassle and constantly running out of product annoying others customers, the owner banned her and her family from the store

Sounds like you could have made lots of money off of her, by not keeping prices quite so artificially low. You knew there would be huge demand, so having larger stocks before your sale would be a pretty obvious solution, too.

you shouldn't get away with using "broadband" as a term unless "broad" really is an applicable adjective

"broad" has NOTHING AT ALL to do with how fast the connection is. I could have a communications link using an extremely wide range of frequencies, and still have very slow internet. The opposite of "broad" is "base", and baseband connections happen to be far, far faster.

You may be thinking of wideband, but that's a different term all-together, and not really applicable, because communications can indeed be sped-up considerably without increasing the bandwidth.

We should have been working hard at improving nuclear power, and solving its problems, to the point that this would, by now, be a no-brainer.

The US Navy has been all-in with Nuclear power. R&D has been non-stop. If they haven't "solved its problems", it's unlikely throwing even more money at it, would do so.

It's also unclear why you feel entitled to make everyone use the Internet the same way you do.

Umm... shouldn't you be saying that exact same thing to the FCC? They're the ones pushing the minimum speeds, with a decent number of customers who don't need it, and sure don't want to subsidize the upgrades for those customers who do.

Broadband didn't use to mean "an Internet connection", but rather "really fast Internet connection".

Maybe we should update the term "dial-up" to be a minimum of 10Mbps? Dial-up used-to mean blazing fast, back when I got my USR 56K modem. Adjusted for todays usage, 56K back then might be 10Mbps today.

So:

dial-up==10Mbps

It makes no sense for rates in downtown Philadelphia to be high because there is a lot of empty land in Arizona.

Unless, say, there's something like a Universal Service fee, that subscribers in Philadelphia have to pay into, and pays to build infrastructure in Arizona... Then, maybe, it just might make sense.

DOS Lynx only works on a 386 or better, which you could get to run an old Linux or Minix OS instead of crippled-old DOS.

DOS Lynx is also not very faithful to the original.

For DOS web browsing, you really want Bobcat:
http://www.fdisk.com/doslynx/b...

ELKS would give you 16-bit Linux, but you'd really have to be willing to take over development, as it really doesn't have any apps to go with it.

If two people are watching HQ videos (netflix, youtube, etc), that's easily 8-10mbps *minimum*. Figure the other two are listening to music and playing online games and maybe you have a guest who is using skype or something... bandwidth just doesn't go very far in today's world, unless you're living like it's still the late 90s as far as your entertainment consumption and communication.

Yeah, you're a dammed primitive if you stream videos in less than 4K!

You've thrown-out all your DVDs by now, haven't you? They're only 480p, if you're lucky, you cave man, you...

Meanwhile, 16:9 480p looks pretty good on my 40" HDTV, and Hulu streams it in DVD quality at 750Kbps (works at 500Kbps, too, if you don't mind some artifacts)... At that rate, 5 people could be streaming different videos *simultaneously* on your "late 90s" internet connection, with headroom for other stuff at the same time.

And personally, that sounds like a nightmare of a family life to me... This may not be the 50s, but everyone alone in their rooms, watching their own HDTVs, all-day, every-day (has to be *simultaneous*, remember?), nobody watching things together, nobody out doing any other activities, etc.

4/1 is sufficient for my 2 year old daughter, my dead grandmother, and my cat who mostly just wants to chase the mouse around the screen. Pretty much everyone ELSE in the house wants more than that.

I work in IT, and I don't really want that much speed.

I was happy with Time Warner's 2Mbps service for $15/mo. when I was in their service area. And with that, I was working from home quite often, streaming Hulu no problem, etc. I hear Netflix does a crap job of encoding and needs much more bandwidth, but since they don't support Linux, I've never been interested. I hear lots of people complaining about ultra-high-def, but I'm pretty happy with SD for my on-demand viewing, as long as it's 16:9.

I'm not in their service area anymore (and if Comcast buys them it'll double the price to match theirs), and all the cheapest wired internet services in my area start at $30/month. I'd love to get cheaper DSL, but FIOS deployment means they will no longer sell it.

I get much higher speeds for the money, which I don't use for anything except for torrents finishing before I can blink. I could see the advantages for a house full up with a big family, but otherwise it's just a pissing contest, like the top-speed of your sports car that's always stuck in traffic... And its an ongoing waste of money every month that I'd rather have in my pocket.

Give anyone 4 mbps connection who is living in an area that still has dialup as their only option, and ask them if its broadband. If someone works to bring 4/1 mbps connections to more areas, they should be able to advertise it as broadband.

Funny thing is, thanks to the FCC you can advertise your single-mode Fiber and Ethernet connections as "broadband" even though they're actually baseband technologies.

Meanwhile, you CAN'T call your cable / DSL internet service "broadband" when it's less than 4Mbps, even though they're both decidedly broadband communications technologies.

On the plus side, you're free to advertise your 1Mbps DSL connection as "high-speed" and "blazing fast", because the FCC doesn't regulate those terms... You just can't call it broadband (even though it is).