Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Dangerous Thinking (Score 1) 611

In the conflict envisioned during the Cold War, the purpose of the Soviet Navy was to shut down the sea lanes as much as possible preventing American Reforger (Return of Forces to Germany) operations. The purpose of the American (and other NATO) navies was to keep the sea lanes open as much as possible. This was the exact same scenario that the Allies and Nazi Germany faced in WWII. Hence Germany's and Russia's emphasis on attack submarines and the Allies' and NATO's emphasis on massive fleet formations and projected naval power. So no, the Soviets were not idiots, but they did understand their limitations and their objectives. So does the United States.

Comment Re:Lack of knowledge not an excuse (Score 1) 440

1. He didn't say they were idiots, he said they were unimaginative and afraid of math and science. BIG difference.

2. His post was not a diatribe, it was a carefully thought out series of arguments and I thought it was remarkably calm.

3. His post was certainly comprehensible, and even with some typos and grammatical errors it was several levels of grammar above a typical internet post. In case you've been living under a rock for the last couple of decades you should know that forum posts don't require the same level of proof-reading as a thesis.

4. FWIW, in 12 years of public schooling (13 including kindergarten) I did not receive much grammar education at all. I didn't realize how little grammar I knew until I began studying a foreign language on my own in earnest. The foreign language classes I took in High School were a joke. I learned FAR more English grammar in one year of studying Spanish on my own than I learned in 12 years of public school. Now whose fault is that?

Comment Re:Lack of knowledge not an excuse (Score 1) 440

The thing that people often forget is that teaching itself is a serious talent/skill.

Bullshit. We always have to teach new people how to do things right and unlearn much of the bullshit they are taught in school. We don't have any "special skills" but then again we also understand what we are doing. It's just a matter of the student picking it up. Some pick it up quick, others take time. We also don't "grade" employees based on whether they learn things quicker than others or not, it's how they perform with what they learn that counts.

Comment Re:Humor? Entertainment? (Score 1) 1654

Okay, this makes more sense now. We were assuming she was taking real courses and would need a word processor to, for instance, write a report or something. When you are taking such low-level courses as "Introduction To Microsoft Word" I guess I can see how not having Word would be a problem. Then again the simplicity of the coursework here may mean that you could use OO.o for a Word class and the "prof" wouldn't even know.

Comment Re:Sometimes we forget. (Score 1) 453

A few months ago, the company that I work for had several users click on an executable in an email posing as a UPS shipment confirmation and loaded some hard to remove viruses in their workstations. With the viruses running, they couldn't authenticate to AD so they were locked out of doing any work. It took me about 4 hours to get one computer functioning again, but the other three I had up and running in less than an hour since by then I knew exactly how to deal with it (it turned out beep.sys was reloading the virus every reboot). I can't just run down to Best Buy and buy a new computer for the company, they have to be ordered from the approved vendor. If I had simply replaced the computers, we would have had 4 critical employees without computers for 3-4 days, and we would have spent about $2000 instead of 5 hours of my time.

Slashdot Top Deals

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...