Last I checked I am not the one in the zoo doing tricks for peanuts.
With a bit of philosophical reflection on modern human life, I think that's debatable.
mv --force
2. His post was not a diatribe, it was a carefully thought out series of arguments and I thought it was remarkably calm.
3. His post was certainly comprehensible, and even with some typos and grammatical errors it was several levels of grammar above a typical internet post. In case you've been living under a rock for the last couple of decades you should know that forum posts don't require the same level of proof-reading as a thesis.
4. FWIW, in 12 years of public schooling (13 including kindergarten) I did not receive much grammar education at all. I didn't realize how little grammar I knew until I began studying a foreign language on my own in earnest. The foreign language classes I took in High School were a joke. I learned FAR more English grammar in one year of studying Spanish on my own than I learned in 12 years of public school. Now whose fault is that?
The thing that people often forget is that teaching itself is a serious talent/skill.
Bullshit. We always have to teach new people how to do things right and unlearn much of the bullshit they are taught in school. We don't have any "special skills" but then again we also understand what we are doing. It's just a matter of the student picking it up. Some pick it up quick, others take time. We also don't "grade" employees based on whether they learn things quicker than others or not, it's how they perform with what they learn that counts.
There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.