They clearly aren't smart enough, for the low bar that is wall street.

1. They are teachers.
2. They got caught cheating in tests in the US.
3. They didn't take a deal but instead went to trial and got convicted.

Whether he "fails at business" depends on what the probability of him being caught was and the probability of various sentence options.

How did he "lose"?

He got to be President for the maximum amount of time currently allowed. He got to make a mint (not that he's short a buck to start with) on the speaker tour afterwards. What did he actually lose?

Halo was going to be a Windows and Mac release: http://www.ign.com/articles/19...

Of course it would have been a different game anyway...

None of my questions were "hard". 3 were the street, city, and county and somewhere i had lived - and the correct options where all for one address. And the other question was what bank did you open a credit card with in 2005. So anywhere I had something shipped from that I paid via a credit card had all the answers in that one transaction.

It's "living dead" not "un dead" - the zombie lobby will be up in arms at that non-PC language.

Actually maybe that's what the article is claiming. The living dead zombies were attacking the NSA but they are now dead dead since luckily an agent on duty new to aim for the head.

It's the dead level of dead, obviously.

It lies between "pretty dead" and "extra dead".

No one has the right not to be mocked.

You are ignoring that homosexuality is between consenting adults (the type that is legal anyway - homosexual rape isn't legal for example). Whereas bestiality and pedophilia are not. Which is a pretty significant difference making your "only difference" claim absurd.

That would defeat the entire purpose of the lock state.

You'll have to point out the part where I proposed forming a mob and restraining strange people. Or are you making shit up?

Understanding the causes and trying to mitigate them in the future has exactly jack shit to do with whether or not the person involved is a "complete scumbag".

You declare the person a scumbag and declare that what was "going on in their lives" does not excuse their behavour or make them any less of a scumbag and also try and understand causes. We do this all the time, so I'm a bit surprised you could be so incredibly stupid as to not notice.

They are irrelevant. People who commit mass murder especially of random civilians are complete scumbags. It doesn't matter if their daddy touched them or if they are going through a tough divorce or if their favorite TV show got cancelled or whatever it is "going on in their lives" that you think justifies mass murder.

If you want to kill yourself, go right ahead. Don't take 150 other people most of whom you have never met with you - certainly don't expect not to be called a scumbag if you do.

Bullshit. From the article: "Students paid up to $15,000 for IIPM’s courses."

So they can plunk down $15,000 in fees but can't "afford data charges" to do a tiny bit of non-wikipedia research on what that $15,000 is going to get them?

Again, bullshit.

Writing lots of small strings to disk one by one, is faster than building an in memory string up from those small strings one by one - reallocating a larger chunk of memory and copying the entire current string on each little step.

It's almost like memory allocation and copying data over and over might slow things down a bit over simply not doing that at all.

Honestly the paper is completely retarded. Only a moron would not expect that result.

If stealing the milk is a felony. And the death was caused by the stealing of the milk then sure.

But that wouldn't be the case in your example, since it's not a result of the felony (and there's not a felony start with unless that's really expensive milk in most jurisdictions).

And no you can't shoot everyone in the bank unless you someone make it appear like that was all caused by the robbery - which is going to be rather difficult. And even then someone else getting charged doesn't mean you don't as well.