Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment We are becoming Third World (Score 3, Informative) 66

Great. Now we have a bunch of under-insured, illegal jitney drivers, just like any third-world nation...

Read the tales of woe of Uber-X drivers who have lost their personal insurance. Yes, riders and the other driver in an accident are covered by Uber-X, up to an inadequate $100,000.

California Livery law requires $1,000,000 insurance, though, and specific licensing to drive passengers for hire.

These drivers typically have neither of these, though. And personal policies generally specifically exclude driving for hire. So, driver gets in an accident, Uber pays, and driver is now out of a job (or side job) and is uninsurable.

Comment 1980 called... (Score 1) 314

I worked on this:

http://www.csmonitor.com/1980/...

It was a hacked GM X-car with batteries in what was the transmission tunnel, and most of the rest of the underside of the car. And, in fact, it had a full under-pan.

I don't recall it being touted as a safety feature, but instead, it was there to help reduce wind resistance.

I think the major hazard was the potential for chlorine leaks. It leaked on The Today Show. "Oh, that? It's just chlorine, just like in your swimming pool..."

Tell that to the Madison Height, Mi. fire department! (We had them out a few times...)

Comment Two monopolies (Score 1) 125

I avoid Luxottica eyewear, because they have monopolized the industry and hurt small producers. They are on a constant buying binge to buy-up any producer that might gain some traction in showrooms, and make monopolistic demands on retailers.

They make (IMO) poor-quality eyewear at inflated prices. Most of the "designer" labels they make agreements with seem to be OK with this. BTW, you should be able to get any Luxottica products on line for at least half off of retail, because the prices are so inflated. You can get actual quality eyewear for the same price.

Retailers and professionals hate them, but have no choice.

Good one, Google. You really showed us how you do no evil.

Comment Beta testing! (Score 1) 235

Ah, it appears Harris is doing beta testing, and handing these out to police departments to test. So, they don't want the cops blabbing to their competitors.

1. Does Harris have the proper permissions to do this in the wild like this?

2. It'd be an interesting question whether a civil contract like this can trump disclosure requirements. Seems to me there's no way the cops can make use of the results of testing. Maybe they can test, but if they act on it, they have to violate either the NDA or the law.

Comment Legality? (Score 1) 235

Are these devices even legal? What country?

I know know that FCC regulations in the U.S. are regularly flouted by the use of similar "range booster" devices that you can get at Fry's, etc. but they are illegally imported and sold.

I'd imagine there are exceptions for law enforcement, but I'd also imagine that the law enforcement agency has to at least do some sort of registration with the FCC.

I'm guessing that the manufacturer just doesn't want to get in trouble with the FCC...

Comment Re:Huh? (Score 1) 137

- "I don't understand. How is Google supposed to fix every wrong map listing?"

By relying primarily on official and/or reliable sources.

- Business licenses
- Property tax rolls
- yellow pages listings

Yea, I get it. Google wants to make things more up-to-date by crowd-sourcing data. But you can't trust the "crowd". They need to make sure that new/changed listings are confirmed by multiple independent reports. And it would't hurt to at least glance at Street View to confirm...

"Here comes the Google van! Quick, put up the "FBI" sign!"

Comment Re:My Toyota has had this since 2004... (Score 1) 151

Modern phones, including Android, iPhone, etc. etc. etc. have this ability. Whether or not a given navigation app uses it is another matter.

You don't have to use wheel sensors or the odometer (did you mean speedometer?), although those are useful inputs.

A more applicable and general term than "dead reckoning" is "sensor fusion".

Here's what Wikipedia has to say about dead reckoning:

"In navigation, dead reckoning (also ded (for deduced) reckoning or DR) is the process of calculating one's current position by using a previously determined position, or fix, and advancing that position based upon known or estimated speeds over elapsed time and course."

But we can do better than that, today, and there are a number of sensors that - with the right math - can be "fused" to provide a more accurate estimate of position than would be possible using any one. GPS, then, is just one potential input.

Wikipedia gives a very broad definition, as this isn't just applied to navigation:

"Sensor fusion is the combining of sensory data or data derived from sensory data from disparate sources such that the resulting information is in some sense better than would be possible when these sources were used individually. The term better in this case can mean more accurate, more complete, or more dependable, or refer to the result of an emerging view, such as stereoscopic vision (calculation of depth information by combining two-dimensional images from two cameras at slightly different viewpoints)."

Phones today typically have GPS, accelerometer, magnetometer, and gyro sensors. While additional inputs such as auto speedometer (not very accurate, though, by law only required to be +- 1.5% or so) and wheel sensors might be useful, they certainly aren't required.

I'd assume that major navigation apps already do this, probably using Kalman Filtering:

http://www.cs.unc.edu/~welch/k...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K...

So, this is nothing new. But, then again - there's no claim that it is. (Just the incorrect reading between the lines here...) They've just conveniently put the needed sensors and a means of performing the calculations in a single chip.

You know, just like Apple did for the iPhone 5S...

Slashdot Top Deals

The hardest part of climbing the ladder of success is getting through the crowd at the bottom.

Working...