How do we identify them?

Not sure why this is marked as flamebait, he's drawing a relevant comparison between the services mentioned in TFA.

neural networks to me!

No it's not. MW2 and BC2 are completely different styles of games. BC2 is designed to be a more full-scale-war based game like Delta Force Black Hawk Down, Joint Operations et al, where as MW2 is a more spec-ops-quick-fast-action game. You've apparently never played either.

Yes you are correct about my point. I should have been more clear, unpredictability in the service of ADSL from BT as a whole was meant to be the focus of my original point. In my experience it just wont work for real time stuff unless you are in the ideal location etc, which most people arn't.

The problem with ADSL is that the service deteriorates rapidly the further away from the exchange you are. So while this might be ok for browsing web pages, i have had profound problems with services such as iPlayer, youtube et al. Also, unless you ring up BT and request it, you basically get lumped with a poor ping (approx 40-100ms based on the service i am getting now) which is hopeless for anything real time.

In my experience ADSL broadband has always been out performed by DSL in both speed and quality. Given the technical requirements of OnLive i can't possible see how this is going to work for any real time games. Looks like you're going to have to be practically sat on top of the exchange box for this to work.

PATENT THAT NOW!

browsers because there will be no internet.

the necklace and make it work for multiple people at the same time and then it will be more than just a gimmick.

She the founder?

Why would they take iPads? If nasa thought pads were useful in space they would have built their own years ago.

I agree that people can get a bit hyper about shit sequels. The same is done for computer games though to be honest and while i have more important things to worry about in my life, they clearly don't :D

Because sequels are often a complete cop-out.

the point in this because, for gaming in say MW2 or CS:S, you arn't interested in anything further out than a single monitor provides. The good players don't look around, they look blankly at the screen until they see something move and then twitch to it. Given that screen space of this vastness is going to put more of the game to your peripheral vision, i can't see the advantage. I'd be very surprised if you went to LAN parties and the 'elite' players used a setup like this. It does have its advantages for strategy games however where more screen real-estate is valuable and for movies, but for that to be any fun to use manufacturers will have to make specialist monitors with no screen frames.