I've noticed one aspect my Slashdot use has changed since Slashdot's CSS makeover last year: the way I quote.

I used to do it simply: I'd just surround the pasted text with <i>...</i> tags, and let Slashcode fill in the paragraph breaks. It served as a visual cue. In fact, since most people quote at the top of the comment, it's more aesthetic than a plain, default indent-and-nothing-else <blockquote>.

Since the CSS redesign implemented a visual style for <blockquote>, I've actually started using the <blockquote> tag. Sure, it's longer to type, easier to misspell, and means I have to add all the paragraph tags and switch from "Plain Old Text" to "HTML Formatted" -- but it looks enough better that it's worth the effort.

Yes, actually, I am a standards-based web developer. Why do you ask?

I've been observing my decisions with meta moderation, and have noticed some trends:

1. I let most positive moderations stand.
2. If a post is funny, but not actually insightful or informative, I will generally mark the latter moderations as unfair.
3. I'm a lot more critical of negative moderations than positive. I'll let some stand, but I'm much more likely to mark them as being unfair.