Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Cox is not Rightscorp's enforcer (Score 1) 187

Sounds like Rightscorp didn't like getting the finger, and now they've asked for a *jury* trial. LOL good luck with that, assholes.

You are forgetting the Jamie Thomas case. Juries are apparently trivially simple to first select and then manipulate into awarding multi-million dollar infringement fines over 5 songs. Twice.

And this time the defendant is not in the least bit sympathetic. Rightscorp thinks they can ride anti-corporate and anti-ISP sentiment into a multi-billion dollar fine.

Comment Re:What kind of IT department does Sony run? (Score 1) 155

No offense to the actual IT workers at Sony, as I'm sure their hands are as tied as management allows, but it does make me wonder how this kind of shit gets through IT and not only infects one office, but nationwide, without garnering any attention from the IT pros getting paid to stop things like this?

Easy. By being targeted, Stuxnet style. They knew what IP blocks Sony Pictures uses, and it's quite easy to find machines on a local LAN and stay within it, and Sony is no doubt like most large corporations and links their offices via VPN, so machines at every location also look like the local LAN, so the worm can spread itself to everything it sees. And it can do so quietly. It doesn't have to make a lot of noise to do it. No excessive CPU usage, no excessive network traffic, no nonfunctioning services. It can grow and grow and grow, just as long as it doesn't disturb anything. Most Windows users never look at their process list, and even those who do could miss something with an innocuous sounding name.

And when it determines that it has infected everything it can reach, it contacts its command & control servers, again with innocuous traffic to innocuous looking IP addresses/domain names, and informs its creator that it's ready. The creator picks the time and hits the button, and it triggers its payload. And Sony is shut down for days. Now the worm is in aggressive mode, since it's out from under cover, so it will use all resources at its disposal (Sony's entire network) to keep itself intact and maintain control of the systems. It will aggressively scan for new systems coming online and aggressively try to take them over as quickly as possible. Hence the total shutdown. They're trying to scrape it out of their systems, so they have to disable its ability to reinfect. If they miss even one live instance, odds are good it will promptly reinvade all the freshly installed machines. It's a war. Sony should eventually win it, since it's their home ground and they therefore have physical control of the machines, but that's the only reason. Depending on which cloud services they're using and how, it could come right back in again. It could be a long war.

Comment Re:Advanced malware controlling industrial systems (Score 1) 131

Malware is infamous for aggressively trying to preserve itself. We all joke about how stupid the idea of programming an AI with a strong sense of self-preservation is because of the obvious dangers, but that is exactly how malware is programmed.

You are wanting to be commenting here.

Comment Re:Surprise! (Score 1) 131

About all that's left to comment on is Hot Grits, Natalie Portman and griping about there not being a Cowboy Neal choice any more.

There's no Cowboy Neal choice anymore because Dice is selling the Slashdot poll to the highest bidder. Whichever advertising/polling corporation buys access to it gets to put whatever options they want in it, and professional pollsters conducting srs bsns don't put in a Cowboy Neal option. They don't know what it means.

Is it the humorous option? Is it dissatisfaction with the other choices? Is it the correct choice? Is it none of the above? Is it all of the above? Is it both? Is it Cowboy Neal's choice?

They're trying to calibrate a model of how the Slashdot "audience" responds after they discovered the whole SOPA backlash has a significant stronghold here. (And the programmer who implemented Wikipedia's SOPA protest probably reads Slashdot.) They've found out that the Slashdot population doesn't fit the model, gets lost in the noise of the model, yet wields influence disproportionate to its numbers in certain narrow circumstances. The Cowboy Neal option just fouls up the modeling.

Those few left who are inclined to my my tinfoil hat are welcome to do so, but only after you answer this question: what did you have for breakfast this morning?

Comment Re: writer doesn't get jeopardy, or much of anythi (Score 1) 455

Yeah "it" will be self limiting for the obvious reason - processing takes resources.

Even if you manage to find the resources, it will still be self-limiting. The singularity supposes that the first AIs will be designing the next generation of AIs. I think it's far more likely that they'll be trying to come up with new fart jokes, and channel surfing. People who want to design and build AIs are already rare. Why would artificial people designed to be like people be any more likely than people to want to design and build new people?

Comment Re:Corn Subsidies (Score 1) 186

In fact, there's a good argument that all knowledge creation is via variation and selection, including all knowledge created by humans, though there we call the process speculation and criticism and much of it happens internally so that truly bad ideas never get uttered or written.

You're new here, aren't you? And by "here", I mean the Internet...

Comment Re:In a Self-Driving Future--- (Score 1) 454

So basically, then, the notion is that people won't learn to drive because they don't have to, but they'll still be able to rent a Uhaul truck when it's time to move?

Color me skeptical.

And the UHaul truck will self drive. Really, that was difficult to come up with? Rental agencies for both cars and trucks will be some of the first and most enthusiastic adopters, once the technology is proven. It reduces accidents, and therefore damage to their cars, and therefore improves the bottom line quite directly.

Comment Re:Open? (Score 1) 33

Facebook only reuses crap you post on Facebook. These guys want the right to use anything you do ANYWHERE. That's a real over-reach. You should have some say in how your name, image, and words are used.

Such an overreach it's not even legal in the US, let alone most other places in the English-speaking world.

.. and here's the poisoned term:

You can tell from their terms that the site was founded by some recent lawyer graduates and their scummy MBA friends. The recent lawyer graduates think they can write any terms they like and just because it's written down, it's legal. Their scummy MBA friends think wildly lopsided terms is a great way to make money. They got their MBAs from the Comcast School of Monopolistic Practices. They don't realize that you have to actually be the monopoly first before you can behave like one.

Whatever they paid Dice for this pathetic slashvertisement, it was too much. Unlike much of the world, Slashdot commenters can read.

That's not to say they won't make money with this scam. They're bottom feeding scum-sucking algae eaters, but it's a big ocean. There's plenty of bottom out of which to suck money. And who knows. Maybe one of their scummy users tweeting about Helpful (whatever the fuck that is) will hit it big. Kind of like a Kardashian. Doesn't seem likely to do well off of Slashdot though.

Slashdot Top Deals

The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh

Working...