Comment: Re:Unnecessary if.... (Score 1) 423
Comment: How long before somebody bundles it in a download? (Score 2, Insightful) 286
Save Complete Page in Firefox doesn't get even close to all the pieces. This must be preserved, to be played every year on May 21st. Is there a save Addon that can get it all automatically or do I have to spelunk in my cache?
Comment: It's a trap! (Score 1) 286
It's a trap! They're just trying to encourage greater uptake of Google Chrome! 'cause it plays like crap in Firefox with a lot of tabs open, but is very smooth in Chrome, with the V8 engine underneath it.
Those evil evil Googlers...
Comment: Re:The Plugin Plug Challenge, Street Parkers (Score 2, Informative) 327
Few people in America have Garages to charge their electric cars.
More have Street parking in front of their townhouse or single family house.
Typical myopia of a city-dweller. Try looking at numbers before talking. Cities in the US haven't changed appreciably in population since the '50s. Nearly all the population migration in the past half century was into suburbs. Where a whopping 52% of the country now lives. One of the major distinguishing factors of suburbs vs. urban areas is the high availability of both garages and private driveways. Add to that the entire rural population, another 25% of the country as of 2000. They can do practically anything they like on their property, with no homeowner's associations to worry about. So slightly more than 75% of the country is trivially able to charge an electric vehicle right now, and that ignores numerous garages in cities.
There is a potential market for a street-side charging station, but it's much smaller than you imagine.
Comment: Re:Rolling Blackouts (Score 4, Informative) 327
Comment: Re:The thing that makes electrics un-economical (Score 3, Interesting) 327
Comment: Re:externality (Score 1) 875
You do realize that most large scale commercial air conditioning units are gas fired, right? As in natural gas? They don't use electricity for anything other than low voltage control systems.
Comment: Re:This goes along with ... (Score 2, Interesting) 192
Google actually tried that for a while. Sort of. There was a little grey X in a box near the end of each search result that would hide it on the page if you clicked it. Complete with a cute little animation of the result poofing into a cloud and contracting on itself. I used it every time I saw expert-sexchange come up in searches.
It went away a while ago. Presumably somebody wrote a bot to X every search result ahead of their own, then spammed the hell out of it.
Comment: Re:Why?? (Score 1) 753
None of the answers to you so far really come out and say it. The opinion on Slashdot is correct. Consumers have a right to consume any and every nonphysical that has been created. It's called the public domain, and copyright is intended to protect it, not stifle it.
From the very beginning of the concept of copyright, it was sold as a means to be sure that every idea is eventually available to everyone, without price. It is meant to improve the richness of free ideas by granting a short term, temporary distribution monopoly on ideas in an effort to encourage publication of ideas. Once the idea is generated and fixed in a tangible medium, the clock starts, ticks down, and then the idea is free, to everyone, everywhere.
So yes, Slashdot thinks such a right should exist, because such a right DOES exist, and has always existed, and it's a sign of how horribly twisted and warped copyright has become through the efforts of modern industrial concerns that you don't know that anymore. The right to consume ideas exists and ultimately trumps the right to control distribution, and that right is explicitly enumerated in the US Constitution. Creators are neither rare nor godlike. Nor are they worthy of your misplaced veneration.