Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Unnecessary if.... (Score 1) 423

by Areyoukiddingme (#32316114) Attached to: IBM's Patent-Pending Traffic Lights Stop Car Engines
Traffic circles have major downsides. First, they take up vastly more real estate than a stoplight or stop sign intersection. Second, they require drivers to know how to merge. Many many drivers no longer know how to merge correctly. In some states (Missouri), it's pathological. And third, traffic circles completely and utterly fail when traffic volume exceeds a certain threshold. That threshold varies depending on the size of the circle and the merging competence of drivers, but regardless, it is universally lower than throughput a well-timed stoplight can achieve. In older cities, traffic circles fail on the first check. There's no room for circles. End of story.

Comment: Re:The Plugin Plug Challenge, Street Parkers (Score 2, Informative) 327

by Areyoukiddingme (#32293824) Attached to: Toyota Partners With Tesla To Make Electric Cars

Few people in America have Garages to charge their electric cars.

More have Street parking in front of their townhouse or single family house.

Typical myopia of a city-dweller. Try looking at numbers before talking. Cities in the US haven't changed appreciably in population since the '50s. Nearly all the population migration in the past half century was into suburbs. Where a whopping 52% of the country now lives. One of the major distinguishing factors of suburbs vs. urban areas is the high availability of both garages and private driveways. Add to that the entire rural population, another 25% of the country as of 2000. They can do practically anything they like on their property, with no homeowner's associations to worry about. So slightly more than 75% of the country is trivially able to charge an electric vehicle right now, and that ignores numerous garages in cities.

There is a potential market for a street-side charging station, but it's much smaller than you imagine.

Comment: Re:This goes along with ... (Score 2, Interesting) 192

by Areyoukiddingme (#32267376) Attached to: Taylor Momsen Did Not Write This Slashdot Headline

Google actually tried that for a while. Sort of. There was a little grey X in a box near the end of each search result that would hide it on the page if you clicked it. Complete with a cute little animation of the result poofing into a cloud and contracting on itself. I used it every time I saw expert-sexchange come up in searches.

It went away a while ago. Presumably somebody wrote a bot to X every search result ahead of their own, then spammed the hell out of it.

Comment: Re:Why?? (Score 1) 753

by Areyoukiddingme (#32238776) Attached to: Why I Steal Movies (Even Ones I'm In)

None of the answers to you so far really come out and say it. The opinion on Slashdot is correct. Consumers have a right to consume any and every nonphysical that has been created. It's called the public domain, and copyright is intended to protect it, not stifle it.

From the very beginning of the concept of copyright, it was sold as a means to be sure that every idea is eventually available to everyone, without price. It is meant to improve the richness of free ideas by granting a short term, temporary distribution monopoly on ideas in an effort to encourage publication of ideas. Once the idea is generated and fixed in a tangible medium, the clock starts, ticks down, and then the idea is free, to everyone, everywhere.

So yes, Slashdot thinks such a right should exist, because such a right DOES exist, and has always existed, and it's a sign of how horribly twisted and warped copyright has become through the efforts of modern industrial concerns that you don't know that anymore. The right to consume ideas exists and ultimately trumps the right to control distribution, and that right is explicitly enumerated in the US Constitution. Creators are neither rare nor godlike. Nor are they worthy of your misplaced veneration.

Pyros of the world... IGNITE !!!

Working...