Comment Re:Perspective (Score 1) 323
real actual slavery that still exists in the world
As someone who demands precision, you should consider using real actual grammar that still exists in the world.
real actual slavery that still exists in the world
As someone who demands precision, you should consider using real actual grammar that still exists in the world.
It says a lot about Quickflix that their CEO just told their remaining clients how to go to the competition.
If stupid was flammable we'd have already seen the flash and soon would come the boom.
But it's 5 days of millions of people. So it's centuries of their souls, compared to just some years.
U2 should pay the soul difference. Preferably not in music. Please.
It's not overblown. People simply care more about the technology they bought than about whether some people are enslaved some thousand miles away. And you do to, so don't be a hypocrite.
It's worse than that.
It's "I'll punch everyone in the face just as strong as before, but everyone votes to decide which side I'll hit."
You are connected to Internet. What's the point on duplicating information?
If you don't understand a term, you can search its explanation yourself.
I don't dispute the recognition of a random chance of nasty boulder on the landing spot. I do dispute the vague quantification of such risk.
I wouldn't have a problem with "The chosen spot has an estimated 2% chance of unavoidable crashing conditions.". However, "a good slice of luck" doesn't belong at news about arguably the recent highest engineering achievements of humanity.
Maybe the second "average" was "over time".
(I know. I'm a naive optimist.)
I believe 67P is indeed tumbling, but I can't find a reliable reference to that information.
Avoiding all of these dangers will require a good slice of luck as well as careful planning.
"A good slice of luck"? Seriously?
Whoever managed to get approved a project plan with that caveat, is my new god.
Yeah, but you can't have a main character named "Otw", or "Ethre".
You'd have to go all the way up to 10 to get a decent name, and by then you'd be infringing Tolkien's IP.
Google and their hardware partners are doing a lot to bring the benefit of technology to more people than have had it before.
Well... Yes. All technology corporations try their best to bring technology to more people than before.
The opposite would be, thievery. Or, if instead of "less technology" you go for the "less people" route, murder.
And there was hardly need to sell each of the three phones in a different online AND offline store.
What percentage of smartphone owners currently use one that would cost 100$ to buy new?
Is a 2014 cheap phone better than a 2012 good one? For how long?
The one day you'd sell your soul for something, souls are a glut.