Comment I don't get it? (Score 1) 75
To me, the images seem more like abstract art (which I generally don't connect with) than a revolutionary camera technique.
To me, the images seem more like abstract art (which I generally don't connect with) than a revolutionary camera technique.
300ms is definitely not the norm. I live on the US east coast and my latency to LA or Seattle is usually 100ms or less. However the OP doesn't mention whether the latency is ~300ms to all addresses or only the mentioned test servers. If you're pinging 300ms to all machines in the same country on a modern broadband connection, that connection is definitely broken. Since you mentioned it's DSL, my quess would be trouble in the phone lines.
Bad routes can also be to blame for poor latency, although that would only affect the latency to destinations on certain networks. I once had a ping of 200ms from Atlanta, GA to a server in Houston, TX. Turns out the traffic was being routed from ATL, to DC, to NYC, to Chicago, to Seattle, to San Francisco, and finally back east to Houston. No joke. Luckily, I was at a university who happened to have a very understanding IT staff. They were able to force that traffic to go out over a secondary ISP that was available. The average Joe Customer of any big box ISP usually isn't that lucky though. Bad routes are something that many users just have to deal with.
This file will self-destruct in five minutes.