...think they should pay anything for stealing the rights away from property owners.

...be paid to landowners for easements? We've already been sold down the river when it comes to commercial aircraft and radio waves that pass over our property. Personally, I think the line should be drawn here. You want to fly a drone a few feet over my house, you pay.

So WPA2 wasn't necessary? Really looking forward you to enlightening me here.

Are you sure? I thought WPA2 was created to solve the problems with WPA.

I thought WPA was found to be insecure a long time ago! Are there really still entities that depend on it for security?

Surprised that a site for scientific minded people does not include that caveat.

...open hardware could prevent us from paying exorbiant prices for decent performance and allow us to get the full value out of the hardware we invest in. I had to allow scripts from "academia-assests.com" to view the text of the first link if anyone else runs into the same blank page I did when I clicked on it.

I don't know, and perhaps it isn't so.
But the more machines control our gates,
The less we humans can control our fates.
But into the future we go!

...that banks are 100% liable in cases such as this. It is up to them to verify that any access to the accounts that they hold are made by the legitimate account holders. Seriously, think of what the world would be like if any yahoo could write a check against any account without them veryifying the authenticity of the signature.

Somebody needs to put these paid taxi services to bed. Ride sharing in no way involves set fares.

Because criminals doesn't deserve a second chance...

No, rapists should not be given a chance to rape again.

How about self regulation? This isn't simple fleecing of riders we are talking about here, this is rape! So just what is Uber and the other ride "sharing" companies doing to ensure their drivers will not rape their riders anyway?

...surveil that plan!!

Is it the lack of education that keeps the poor taking from each other rather than taking from the rich? I'm sure mine is not the only city that has "Boardwalk" located close enough to "Baltic" that the poor without much effort could take what they want from the rich. Yet still, the poor continue to rob from the poor.

It is free markets that keeps the US so highly rated among the developed nations in providing internet service to its citizens and, as everyone knows, the US is all about providing infrastructure that encourages competition. Imagine, if you will, how bad it would be if a single corporation were allowed to control access to all the roads in a nation! That corporation could dictate rates and refuse service to any and all who refuse to meet their price. Thankfully the majority in the US have come to the understanding that such travesties must be regulated against.