Ha! I have been shaming and banning fat people for years now. Where is my patent?
Strange... this would almost lead someone to conclude that these border patrol agents are some sort of collection of individuals whose behavior might vary.
Nah, that is just silly.
Nowadays things still die when you kill them with fire
Crypto wouldn't work... the cloner doesn't have to break the encryption to copy the chip.
Imagine in this way.... you have an encrypted hard drive, and someone wants to pass off their hard drive as yours. They don't have to break the encryption... they can copy the drive byte for byte, and hand it to the person who if verifying that is the original. The person checking the data is the one who does the decrypting.
I don't know if it will be that easy. These fingerprints seem to be based on the fact that all RFID chips have flaws, and they are all flawed in different ways.... including the device that is trying to act as the clone of the RFID. What this means is that this clone RFID has to be able to mimic EXACTLY the flaws of the real thing without giving itself away by its OWN flaws. Without knowing more details about the flaws they are trying to measure, it is hard to say whether that would be possible. If the flaws are easily mimicked in the sense that you can create a clone whose own defects are not detected because they are all superseded by the original's flaws, it may work. If they vary so much that every clone will have some flaw that is severe enough to shine through, it would be impossible.
There is a difference between a normal password and a password used for encryption. For example, a password to log in to a website does not need to be able to handle 4 million guesses a second.... it will be rate limited by the website way before that happens.
You only need to choose a large random password for encryption that you need to be able to handle a local access attack..... like hard drive encryption... so you most likely only need one. so it is probably something you don't have to type in very often..... and you can choose something you never change, as a local disk attack is unlikely to occur without you realizing it, at which point you can know to change your password to something new and very long.
So you have to physically open the safe every time you want to back up you data? That sounds like quite a bit of a hassle to me, and I can imagine you start skipping days because you it is too much work to open the black box, take out the hard drive, connect it, run the back up, put the drive back in the safe, and lock it back up... with an online backup, your backups can take place automatically every couple of hours without having to physically move anything.
Also, what happens if the black box is stolen?
I don't think this is necessarily fair. Laws inherently need to be complex, as they address complex issues. While you may find a person that can fully understand ONE area of law, it would be impossible to find a single congressperson (or any person) who could understand fully ALL the laws that cover all areas of government. Take an environmental protection law for example... to fully understand the consequences of a carbon tax, for example, you would need to be an expert in climate science, economics, etc... you will never find anyone that is an expert in all of the things required.
What you hope, is that a congressperson surrounds himself with the necessary experts, who brief him/her as well as they can on the things they have to know to come to a sound decision. Anyone who thinks they can understand all of the consequences of a law all by themselves is delusional.
It is also not just about going digital, but consolidation of digital content. I used to burn movies, backups, and other content that I wanted to save but not use every day to DVDs... but with TB hard drives so cheap now, it is much easier just to place that data on a hard drive. They are more reliable, easier to keep backups of, and faster.
Think about most people you know who have a decent size DVD collection... why keep all those separate DVDs, that take up a ton of space, get dusty, and can fail. You could easily store a very large DVD collection on a TB drive, and back them up to another TB drive.
In addition, I keep ALL my old documents. I have documents dating back 20 years to my elementary school days... I have copies of school papers I wrote for 4th grade, computer programs I wrote in 3rd grade, etc... I find it hilarious to look back at how I wrote and coded when I was so young, and someday I can share it with my kids. When it is so easy to archive stuff, why not?
of COURSE they aren't real researchers. The summary writer mistakenly thought the study authors were from UCLA, which would mean they would have been some of the smartest, unbiased, amazing people in the world. However, they were actually from USC, meaning they were spoiled, unprofessional, RIAA lapdogs who also smell.
And yes I happened to go to UCLA, but that is besides the point.
These guys are from USC, not UCLA. As a UCLA graduate, I am extremely upset that anyone would make this mistake. USC students and professors are smelly, unclean, spoiled children who work for the RIAA. UCLA students and professors are the opposite.
Never, EVER, confuse us again.
"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein