Does it carry voice? Does it do so over IP packets? Sounds like VoIP to me. It's not SIP or an open protocol, and it can carry video as well as voice, but it definitely meets the definition of voice over IP.
The problem with all of these services is fragmentation. If I have a telephone, I can call anyone else who has a telephone, irrespective of what operators we both use. If I have a SIP account somewhere, I can generally do the same thing. If I have a Facetime account, then I can't call someone with Google Hangouts. Without federation, these services are far less useful than they could be (to users - the lack of federation is useful for encouraging lock-in, so good for the providers if they're big enough).
Because he's a scientist and if Hollywood has taught me anything it's that, once you get to a certain level of proficiency as a scientist, you can instantly turn your mind to anything and understand it.
Actually, most physicists I've met seem to believe this too...
"Based on a true story" means "based on the title of a book that you might recognize." If you don't know that, you should be kept in a home for the mentally insufficient, for your own safety.
'Based on' should be on Wikipedia's list of weasel words. True story:
A guy was bitten by a spider.
Based on this true story:
A guy was bitten by a spider and turned into spiderman!
You can recognise the true story from the film, but that's not why you watch the film...
Really? I remember mocking the one person I knew who got a Pentium 4 instead of an Athlon or a (by then, much cheaper, Pentium 3). We all knew that it could have 140 instructions in flight at a time, so needed heroic work from the branch predictor to have more than a vanishingly small chance of keeping it full and coming close to the theoretical throughput.
The thing that emerged later was the reason for the problem. It takes around 5 years to get a CPU to production, so you need to make a guess at what the available process technology in five years will be. For once, Intel got it wrong. They expected to be able to launch the P4 at 4GHz and scale it up to 10GHz within roughly the same thermal envelope. At that speed, even if you can only keep the pipeline half full on average, then it's still a very fast chip, and getting to 10GHz with a shorter pipeline is probably not feasible. At 2GHz, it's an embarrassment.
Since it's copyrighted, but not patented (or patentable), you could redesign Linux or *BSD APIs that are similar in principle and operation as the POSIX APIs, but not a complete copy.
Which would have meant that porting code from UNIX to Linux/*NIX would have required shim layers. Worse, it would mean that every program that uses these APIs would be a derived work of UNIX and the UNIX license could prohibit the use of such shim layers.
Just because it affects your pet project does not make it legal.
It's not about my 'pet project', it's about the entire computing landscape. I'd actually be quite happy with a ruling in favour of Oracle: it would completely destroy a large segment of the US software industry and promote investment nearer me...
Happiness is twin floppies.