Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:So (Score 1) 545

The point was, either way you aren't going to get arrested.

And there are legitimate causes for concern if you are irradiated, and while you may not be breaking the law there is a possibility that you are oblivious to it, in which case you should be informed.

"Do you know that you're irradiated?" is a question I'd like to have asked of me if I didn't know i was irradiated.

Comment Re:The war on terror is over (Score 1) 811

Corporations stand to lose business if they gain a reputation of being too invasive. The TSA, being a government agency does not directly rely on the people they infringe on for income. also, the TSA has managed to insert itself into every single commercial airport in the US.

Competition is a good thing, especially in this case.

Comment Re:First Jerk to Fine: (Score 1) 316

Most people don't have to ask. Out of all the comments I read, only yours had any issue with this.

I meant "they", the Slashdot editors. Just in the summaries of a couple of today's articles:
NASA: http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/04/20/2245215/canadian-bureacracy-cant-answer-simple-question-whats-this-study-with-nasa
DARPA: http://science.slashdot.org/story/12/04/20/2146258/hypersonic-test-aircraft-peeled-apart-after-3-minutes-of-sustained-mach-20-speed

You're being silly. If you're on slashdot, you already have a connection to the internet. There's no reason you can't lookup things you don't know.

Comment Re:Unimpressive (Score 1) 438

This is a likewise naive remark, both legally and from a business perspective. Nothing in an NDA (at least any decent document -- paper unfortunately doesn't refuse ink, and a lot of people can put together a ridiculous argument and stamp it at the top with NDA) would create any cause of action. As to a green light to sue, once again paper doesn't refuse ink, alas -- one doesn't need a document to sue for misappropriation, common law or statutory.

My point is, any contract can give both parties grounds to sue (and a likelyhood to win) regardless of whether or not anything malicious or illegal was done.

... regardless of your de facto reservation of rights to steal from them...

So just because I don't want to sign a document that could be used against me maliciously, I'm a thief in your eyes? You just said there are laws that would make my appropriation of someone else's concept illegal. Why should there be anything more than a record of what was told to me?

Comment Re:Foolish (Score 1) 438

So just because you might be employed in the future, you should not engage in public discourse now?

If any company specifically poached from non-NDA companies, there are already laws in place to take care of that kind of behaviour.
Copyright, trademarks, antitrust, trade secrets.

Comment Re:Unimpressive (Score 2) 438

Someone gets into contact with you because of your programming niche.
They probably are going to present ideas that are similar to what you've worked on in the past, based on that assumption.
You sign the NDA, giving them a green light to sue you while employed in your niche, because you're working on projects that are very similar to the idea that the NDA covers. It's more of a CYA move than a moralistic thing.

Hell, I wouldn't sign anything unless it gave me something in return. That mortgage, club membership, tax form etc. all present me some sort of utility in exchange of being bound by their terms.

Also, why is being idealistic bad? Compromise is a concept that's existed for quite a long time.

Slashdot Top Deals

Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.

Working...