WtPHq ?

This Atom D525 Box:

http://www.zotacusa.com/zboxsd-id13.html

( about $200 ) works well once provisioned with RAM, HD and CentOS 6.

For more throughput( about 4x ), this I3-based box runs very well for about $400:

http://www.zotacusa.com/zbox-id82.html

Tiny, well made and reliable.

-- kjh

prove it ...

Dead is Dead

Not to mention that Gasoline or Diesel contains ooo 45 MJ/KG while a LIon Battery stores ooo 1 MJ/KG ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Energy_density.svg

Seems we have a 'little' ways to go before LIon can replace good ole hydrocarbon fuels.

-- kjh

> I actually did think for myself when I rejected GOTO. I actually went back and read the "GOTO considered harmful" essay.
>
> Can you provide an example of when goto is appropriate -- in particular, when it's appropriate to use a goto rather than actually structured
> programming, or even a safer option like break, return, or throw?

When you're telling the CPU what you want it to do ?

Show me an object orientated CPU

Show me a CPU without a jump instruction

-- kjh

When will they stop treating the symptoms and finally outlaw that PHqing Toy OS on ANY machine ?

And I suppose Magma or Lava were already taken ?

http://www.magma.com/
http://www.creative.com/products/mp3/

5. It should not make you reboot

PHq-em

> That whole too complex thing... what, was he hired by Google as a janitor? Or a janitor's helper? Seriously, too complex? For whom? Is he trying to teach a German Shepherd to program? Twit. If you came to my company for a job, and you told me C was "too complex" or "too hard", I'd just show you the door.

Hmmm fyngyrz ...

How can an advocate of the C-Programming Language not know who Rob Pike is ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Pike/

Someone ?

What rocks can one date via C14 ?

-- kjh ( ?? perhaps recent corals ?? )

Please Google !

Challenge your own Patent in East Texas !

-- kjh

God Complex

All --

I remember the early-to-mid-90s when Microsoft gave away their inferior Office
Product with every PeeCee.

It only took a couple years for Microsoft Office to virtually destroy WordPerfect,
Lotus and AMIPro.

IMO, OpenOffice is a much better product today than when Microsoft leveraged their
OS Monopoly to corner the Integrated Office Application Market.

The difference now is that the PeeCee Manufacturers are rightly terrified of MS
so that they apparently refuse to bundle OpenOffice with each PeeCee and perhaps
because OpenOffice lacks an integrated Email App (maybe).

I wish Mark Cuban was right but I am afraid Microsoft's Monopoly is too powerful
to kill with a free product that's 'good enough'.

Too bad ...

-- kjh