The big Internet suppliers have done a bang up job of turning the Internet into TV anyway. Even better than TV from the perspective of the advertisers; you only see one advertisement at a time when watching TV. On the Internet they are able -- with the cooperation of the web page designer -- to have you seeing as many advertisements that can be fit on the screen. Content? Heck... that stuff just gets in the way of -- and takes away space for -- more advertisments. (More and more web sites seem to have used http://websitesfromhell.net/ as a design manual; especially some of the advertisement-heavy examples.)

The pathetic thing is that I don't know of a single person who clicks on ads -- except by accident.

We've managed to raise the global temperature enough to thaw the Arctic areas that are holding huge amounts of methane and have now allowed that to escape into the atmosphere. Unless somebody figures out how to stop further releases of that greenhouse gas, as David Letterman said on his show a year or so ago, "We're screwed."

I used to like tuning in the long-time radio show "Music From The Heart Of Space". When I could find it on a local radio station, that is.

I've done the same thing streaming French or German sites. The music is way better than anything I can get on local radio stations and the ads are innocuous because I can't understand 99.9% of what they're saying.

I don't know about that but the music samples tell me that I'd be bored to tears listening to that all day. I have some favorite CDs that I've found I can put on and play in repeat mode all day if necessary: Porcupine Tree's "The Sky Moves Sideways", Chapterhouse's "Blood Music", Eno's ambient recordings, most any Swervedriver or Ned's Atomic Dustbin, just about anything by J.S. Bach -- I've got a few hour's worth of Bach organ music that I find enjoyable to have playing while I'm writing code, documentation, etc. I'm sure everyone's got their own favorites.

... contribute to a monoculture by avoiding WebKit. Just so long as this isn't just going to be another form of developer lock-in. (Which I suspect it will be.)

And this food the people in the park are going to be selling? How did they get that? They are unemployed after all. Food ain't free for the taking. Or selling.

First he hires a communications director with a history of sending out ugly tweets (that are, apparently, being deleted in an attempt to keep Bush's potential campaign from imploding before it even begins). Then he publishes constituents' email addresses. Doesn't seem all that smart to me.

You ever been to the zoo or an aquarium? How many people turn off the flash when taking a picture of something through glass?

I do.

You're certainly in the minority. Most of those people probably haven't figured out where that big white blob in the photos came from. Speaking of flash... how many people come home after the Super Bowl -- or some other giant arena event -- and are disappointed with the photos they took while they were there saying "But I used the flash..." We're talking about flash guide number folks and there's no way anyone sitting in the upper deck has a flash capable of illuminating the playing field and getting that one of a kind snapshot of Beyonce. Just one of those things that people don't know any more since everything has been automated and reduced down to merely pushing a button.

It's still tons easier to control camera shake with a small point-n-shoot than it'll ever be with a smartphone. Maybe it's just years worth of muscle memory that allow me to shoot shake free with a point-n-shoot. I've never been able to get a smartphone camera to get a really sharp photo unless the subject is in bright sunlight.

The low-light performance is the killer feature for me and DSLR. I'd never give that up. The low-light photos that I've taken with my smartphone look like someone push processed Tri-X to about 3200ASA. (And in color it looks even worse.) Plus the camera in the phone takes forever to focus. My phone's camera is my camera of last resort. Only used when I have nothing else available.

... would employ this software in their HR departments to better match prospective employees who've sent their resumes into the company to job openings that would actually be appropriate. I can't remember how many times I've received an email from a company that has my resume on file about a job that would be a "great match" only to read on and discover that the Venn diagram of the position's "gotta have" requirements, previous experiences, and technologies and those listed on my resume don't intersect. At all. I'm sure those companies eventually find someone to fill those roles but they'd find their ideal candidate a lot faster if they were doing a better job with their keyword searches. (Serious... is it really that difficult to set up an ATS?) Maybe MIT's work will help solve this problem for those companies. Or HR departments could stop trying to insulate the hiring managers from the hiring process so that boneheaded notices like the ones I received aren't being sent out. And making the company look completely clueless.

... start to finish. I'll flip over to it from time to time to check on the score. If it turns out that Seattle is beating the tar out of New England, I may keep watching just because I really can't stand the Patriots.

... a few months ago. Now, all of a sudden, I'm without broadband again.

... provide an excuse for their buddies in the chemical, pesticide, and GMO industries that allows them to ridicule the American consumer as a bunch of no-nothings. "See... these rubes^Wpeople don't even know what they're talking about so why should we have to label food that contains man-modified genetic material or household chemicals that contain chemicals that nobody's been able to prove with 100% certainty cause cancer?"

Perhaps the paper was trying to indict the educational system but, more likely, that's not how this poll's result are going to be used.