Can't those idiots be sued?
Maybe you can buy one of those wireless energy receivers... What are they called?
Maybe you can recover some Watts/hour for free?
Those *are* facts. The new system is better in every metric. The old system failed several times. Once it crashed and stayed down for the better part of the day.
The cause of the error in unknown... As always.
Anyway, there's no need for the "root cause". It failed. It was slow. Somebody had to eat a frog and scrap the whole system. And in the 90s they said nobody ever got fired for buying MS. Good old days. Too bad for some it's 2011!!
And you don't have to be bitter, MS' stock may hold a few months more with the Nokia buyout.
The email headers (like To, Cc, Subject) play no part in deciding to whom the message goes.
The message goes only to the recipient pointed in the SMTP conversation, the "RCPT TO:" header.
This example smtp conversation will appear to be addressed to one@example.com but will only be delivered to two@example.com, and not one@example.com
Everything after the "DATA" is useless regarding the final destination of the message:
--- Cut here ---
HELO server
MAIL FROM: linus@linux.com
RCPT TO: two@example.com
DATA
TO: one@example.com
Subject: Got you!
Hello
.
--- Cut here ---
The similar email address is just some creative/random domain substitution
Btw, they are _upgrading_ to Linux, because the previous system (Windows and
This new _upgraded_ system is many orders of magnitude faster.
Unfortunately, it appears, it wasn't properly tested... WTH? I'd expect for the system to run only 100x faster, instead of 1000x faster, during the first few weeks. Or maybe that some API from 1990 stopped working. Wrong data is just too much. Maybe the story isn't telling all the facts?
Google, Amazon, IBM, Redhat,
The man is no doubt a wizard in the arts of illusion, but what I'm more concerned about is the global Police State we're living in.
Old programmers never die, they just hit account block limit.