Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Ummmm ... duh? (Score 1) 385

Of course, now when the pilot has to take a leak there is one less cabin crew, which I'm sure you can construct a scenario in which that's not a good idea.

The solution is right there in the summary: have a flight-attendant lurk in the cockpit.

I'm baffled that this wasn't mandatory. As others have mentioned: what if he passed-out, or had a heart-attack? It's painfully obvious there should never be just one crew-member locked in the cockpit.

Comment Re: Centralized on GitHub! LOL! (Score 3, Informative) 116

With Git, you have a full copy of the repo just by virtue of having "checked out" a copy.

Quick nitpick: that would be a clone, not a checkout.

For the non-git-users among us:

git clone: copy that repository to my local file-system. (All branches are copied across. This is normally over ssh or https.)

git checkout: give me the specified branch. (Doesn't require use of the network.)

git fetch: update the local store of the repository to reflect the current state of the repository on the server.

Slashdot Top Deals

The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford

Working...