On the other side of the coin, I find humor in the fact that supporting facts of such conspiracies, such as the FEMA facilities to... lets say "secure" a large number of people at many different locations throughout the US and the purchase of a number (about 1.6 billion rounds, just over 5 for each US citizen) of bullets by DHS that is far past the point of ridiculous, given how common circumstantial convictions seem to get a pass these days, that there is enough evidence to convince 12 of your average US citizens who actually end up on a jury of such a conspiracy. I honestly doubt some elaborate scheme by elite wealthy busy bodies who conspire to control the world by decimating the population. It is so much easier to believe in a group of elite wealthy busy bodies conspiring to make themselves wealthier utilizing the massive economy associated with everyone remaining alive and well. See... now THAT happens. News agencies conspire to push propaganda for this evil empire? Nah, more likely they simply push the political agenda of those who control them. GOP/Dem politicians working hand in hand towards a NWO? Nope... their work is all about getting elected, repayment of debts from the "people" (corporations) who funded their campaign to office and extending what power they have in office.
Sure all together is seems like some great evil master plan, but the simplest explanation makes more sense. FEMA concentration camps would be used for containing viral outbreaks. DHS stock piled ammo heavily to make sure in a crisis they didn't run out, they over purchased to give some room for overhead and whoever did that went waaaaaaaaay overboard. The hundred or so million body bags? Well, it was likely a pain to find someone to make a large order with so again a big buffer coupled with excessive estimates result in enough bags to deal with losing a third of the population in short order. Yes, an outbreak could cause that much death too, but we are past body bags at that point, aren't we?
Still... asking a president who seems to have been mulling over the possibility of disarming the people and likely came to the conclusion that it would be ugly, due to military and law enforcement misgivings about doing so, would love technology that would lack any opinion about enforcing the disarmament of the US public. You would likely get a much warmer reception asking congress to legislate complete congressional control over automated combat machines in effort to take the ability to deploy such systems off the table for the executive branch. See, and that works because they LOVE more power. If you want to see the GOP and Dems truly conspire toss something like that their way. Not that you will have to as the second it comes up for funding to build this massive robotic army is the same second pen goes to paper drafting how such a force will be controlled. I;m sure it will occur to them that it would be bad to place such a heartless army in the hands of one person.