Statistically speaking, we need to get the sober people off the road. Sober people are involved in far more vehicle accidents than drunkards.

Sure you are, you just don't realize it yet.

How else are you supposed to cut your cold, rubbery filet mignon?

And wtf would you do with a sword anyway?

The Indiana Jones scene comes to mind.

Without a doubt.

Social Engineering 101, you have been burned...

What airline are you flying? I don't think I have ever seen proper dinnerware on the lesser side of the curtain.

FTFY

Occasionally, I prefer "intensive purposes" myself.

Hm, and all this time I thought I was the only one. Do all 10th grade English teachers infuse whiskey into their coffee?

Yeah, I should have replied yesterday. I suppose that voting thing got me all in a tizzy and I thought that we were free people for a while.

Silly me, sorry about that!

This citizen is back in line!

/me stands, places hand over heart and recites the Pledge of Allegiance.

In what manner is this comment supposed to help me grasp the health care as a right position?

As a pro-Idon'tgiveafuckwhatyoudoorbelivein, I voted entirely against the two-party system remembering that Einstein said "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results".

Now that the show is over, they will all go to their lavish back rooms, have drinks and laugh at what fools we are for buying their bullshit. On us...

I am all for helping others and what not but I just can not grasp this whole health care as a right position.

Forcing another to perform labor and / or commit resources is a direct violation of your actual rights.

I suppose that's a good point. But what should the requirements be in order to obtain the information? A $1000 subscription? 3 backflips?

The information is in the public domain to expose the "people" donating in order for the public to scrutinize the association. I would argue that impeding access to this information would compound the problems we already have.