Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Uh, unless you're a programmer... (Score 3, Interesting) 766

You missed 95, 98, ME, 2000 and Vista off. Wouldn't make such a convincing argument then, would it?
XP has been supported for so long because they couldn't offer anything better so their customers (read corporates) insisted on them doing so. Being unable to get Vista/7 to run on Netbooks didn't help them either.

Comment Re:"overselling" it (Score 1) 220

Except that they're a BT reseller, so your service is dependent on a third party, they subscribe to the IWF, so your service is filtered, and their FUP lists all the ways they don't allow you to use the service, for example spamming.
I have no problem with them, I'm with a similar BT reseller, but don't delude yourself about what you're getting.

Comment Re:Well, duh. (Score 1) 207

If they partnered with MS and then had their tech stolen that would seem to be a clear breach of contract, so a civil suit alleging that and seeking damages would seem to be in order, not a BS patent spat.

Assuming they had a contract, right? He who sups with the Devil.....
Google

Submission + - How to act like Microsoft? Get sued over Java... 1

chaboud writes: Like a blast from Microsoft's past, Java's new keepers at Oracle have filed what will probably end up being an unfashionably out-of-style double-breasted lawsuit over Google's use of Java in Android, throwing in all of the usual sweet legal nothings, such as "willful," "injunction," and "damages." I wish someone had told me earlier that the way to make money off of software was to stand around with a law degree.

Submission + - Oracle sues Google for patent infringement (theregister.co.uk)

bit4byte writes: Various sources are reporting the Oracle is sueing Google for patent infringement on the Andriod paltform.
This mainly resovolves around Java and patents that Oracle America now owns due to the purchance of Sun Microsystems.
Here is a link to the actual complaint:
http://regmedia.co.uk/2010/08/13/oracle_complaint_against_google.pdf

Comment Re:Is such a ban stupid or what? (Score 1) 601

Since it was a European airport it's pretty unlikely to be a US law ;)
Airlines / ports generally don't like people taking pictures of their staff, because they're potentially a weakpoint in security. Staff sometimes have families and other leverage points, and might be persuaded to do things that they otherwise wouldn't. They take the privacy and safety of their staff very seriously, and I'm not convinced they're wrong to do so.
And surely there are better places to get a picture of your departing loved ones than a check in desk.

Slashdot Top Deals

The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood

Working...