Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Book Review of "Terrible Nerd" by Kevin Savetz (terriblenerd.com)

tgeller writes: "Book Review of "Terrible Nerd" Contact: Tom Geller, 415-317-1805, tom@tomgeller.com, Slashdot username "tgeller" (Note: Slashdot editor Tim Lord and I discussed this review a bit in email. -TG) Title: Terrible Nerd Author: Kevin Savetz Pages: 256 pages Publisher: Savetz Publishing Rating: 7/10 Reviewer: Tom Geller ISBN: 978-1939169006 [Intro text] It's hard to believe that today's nerdier children will one day bore their grandkids with stories of primitive mobile access, household robotics, and 3-D printers. Some will become rich and famous by latching onto tomorrow's winners; others will find themselves irrelevant as the objects of their obsessions fail in the marketplace. But all with the energy to remember will come away with stories from the dawn of creation. One such witness is Kevin Savetz, a 41-year-old technology journalist and entrepreneur whose new book "Terrible Nerd" recounts "true tales of growing up geek" during the '80s computer revolution. It's a rich chronicle that deftly mixes details of his beloved technologies with the zeitgeist a particular time and space. As such, it's an entertaining read for technologists and non-techies alike. [Continued text] Savetz' background was a perfect storm of nerd-incubation factors. Suburban, Californian, white, middle class, and with a statistically improbable number of engineers in the family, he suffered through "special" gym classes and illnesses that drove him further into indoor pursuits. The family's first "computer" appeared around late 1976 in the form of a Fairchild Channel F video game — the first to use ROM cartridges. It was followed by an Intellivision in 1981 before Savetz gained access to his first "real" computer a few months later: an Atari 800 at his father's house, available to him only on bi-weekly visits. As the Atari opens Savetz' world, "Terrible Nerd" traces his progress into a computer-geek community that existed even then. Between epic sessions playing text adventures (like Zork) and 8-bit classics (like M.U.L.E.), he discovered programming, software trading and, ultimately, modem-connected bulletin-board systems (BBSes). This, I think, is where the book is at its most interesting: it charts not only the nascent technology, but also a young man's blossoming into an engaged, social animal. Not that the book is short on personal insights elsewhere. Overall, Savetz does a good job interweaving technology, personal development, and his feelings at the time. It's certainly a personal book, and the author isn't afraid to come off as the bad guy once in a while. He admits to sundry misdeeds, including piracy (ubiquitous then), hacking, forgery, and even rigging a church raffle. But he also shines light on the turbulence of adolescence, from a rocky relationship with his stepfather, to a deceitful boss, to an attempted molestation by a family friend who'd given him a valuable package of software. In this way, it's far more readable than purely technical histories, such as Peter Salus' otherwise fascinating "Casting the Net: From ARPANET to INTERNET and beyond." I would have liked greater cohesion among the stories, though — a story arc, a sense that they were all driving toward something bigger. Without a crystal ball, one doesn't have that sense of purpose at the time; but as this was written in retrospect, he could have done more to tie it all together. On the other hand, one can't fault the author's dedication to recording details of this time — a venture he nobly continues through sites such as atariarchives.org and Classic Computer Magazine Archives. Given his archivist's heart, it's surprising that the book didn't include a much-needed index. For me, "Terrible Nerd" started to slow a bit when Savetz related his college experience in the late '80s. Admittedly, this sense of detachment is partly for personal reasons: my own involvement in computers died down for a few years then, so tales of the IBM PC XT and such awoke no memories. Perhaps those years were just not as technologically interesting, as "hobbyist" computers disappeared, and the focus moved from the family den to the office. Or perhaps adulthood is intrinsically less dramatic than adolescence. In any case, this period of the book is not without its great stories, such as the author's accidental denial-of-service flood that shut down Europe's internet connection, or his involvement with the famous multi-user LambdaMOO. (I regretted that he didn't comment on the attention that that MOO got, first from a notable 1994 Wired article, then from the 1999 book "My Tiny Life.") Around then, his longstanding interest in writing and journalism started to pay off. Advice from established computer journalist John C. Dvorak and a lead from war reporter (and fellow MOO-er) Jacques Leslie led him to his first gig with MicroTimes. That led to many other jobs, including a lucrative position as America Online's "AnswerMan" (for a cut of the service's substantial hourly fees). Writing a FAQ on internet faxing got him into entrepreneurship with FaxZero.com and several other endeavors, and he took part in founding an early community internet service provider (ISP). He continues to write, and to oversee several online businesses, to this day. Like most personal narratives, "Terrible Nerd" has its slow moments — some phases of one's life just aren't as interesting as others. And unlike the best of them, it lacks an overriding theme beyond "It was cool to be a computer kid in the '80s!". But that was enough to keep me hooked. For those of us who shared that time and space, it's well-presented nostalgia; for those coming up now, it's a roadmap for enjoying emerging technologies in today's time and space. ###"

Comment Re:DIED not LOST (Score 1) 88

Quite right. "Lost" also treats living creatures like inanimate property. They weren't lost -- they were killed. They're dead. One day they were running about and exercising free will, now they're lifeless.

Thanks to the text for getting it right. Shame on the headline writer.

Comment Long live the King (Score 2) 218

I met Prince (Regent?) Michael years ago, during the dotcom boom, when HavenCo was still on Sealand. He was in San Francisco to meet with techie folks, and we all had sushi together. He struck me as a good, knowledgeable, fair fellow.

I wish him the best and offer my counsel (for what it's worth) in the service of Sealand.

Comment ...and half the comments make the same dumb joke. (Score 5, Insightful) 633

I'll save you the time: "American beer sucks, har har har".

Really? You *all* think you're clever for saying that?

Anyway -- it's not even true. That is, it's a meaningless statement. America has an enormous range of native beers, of every style, strength, and flavor. It's true that our tastes run toward weaker beers, but it's just stupid to say popular = "American".

Comment Inevitable (Score 1) 625

This, or something like this, is inevitable.

There are certain technical requirements for taking part in society and punishments can be severe.

For example: I suspect that a parent in the U.S. could be considered "unfit" for not having any kind of phone. Well, maybe that on its own wouldn't be damning, but it would be taken into consideration in a custody battle.

Comment Re:Start Studying (Score 1) 402

You don't know what "fluent" means.

Three months of immersion is typically enough to be able to have simple conversations, for example to exchange pleasantries and buy things in the store.

But you'd be lost trying to pick up a conversation in the middle (lacking context), or having a complicated conversation, or understanding jokes, or picking up subtleties required in a business setting. You also wouldn't have much specialized vocabulary.

I don't believe anyone in the history of human existence has acquired "fluency" in any natural language within three months.

(FWIW, I know Esperanto (well; worked in Esperanto business setting), Dutch (high transactional, some conversational), French (low transactional), Russian and Yiddish (tortured reading and basic speaking). I'm a professional writer in American English.)

Comment The best kind of fight is between two enemies (Score 1) 575

This brought a smile to my face. Two groups that are bad for society -- one a dictatorship, the other an ignorant mob -- expending their energy on each other.

I feel like the neutral dwarf army at the end of The Last Battle, standing by while the armies of Lord Tirian and Shift the Ape beating the crap out of each other. (Not to get too nerdy with my allusions....)

The only downside would be if the battle increased the visibility of either group. I just hope the media ignore them while they scratch and pull hair on their playground.

Comment Re:The real headline is (Score 1) 135

This barely merits a response, but what the hell. Where to start?

>Journalists are only allowed to print facts that have been independently verified by their editors.

O.K., I can find three errors of fact in this sentence:

1) "Allowed"? By whom? The Federal Bureau of Truth? You posit an authority where there is none.

2) "...to print facts". You've never heard of an opinion column, or advocacy journalism?

3) "...independently verified by their editors". I don't know what newsroom you work in -- I'm guessing it's none, ever. But as a working writer of over a decade, including a few years in what could fairly be called "journalism", with dozens of editors, I've never once heard of an editor checking a writer's *facts*. That's usually impossible, for one thing. What are they going to do, return to the scene of primary reportage by turning back time? Re-interview the reporter's sources? Get an advanced degree that duplicate's the writer's?

The rest of your post exhibits the same Making Shit Up school of knowledge. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Slashdot Top Deals

Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.

Working...