Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - First Elon Musk, now Steve Hawking warning us about evil AI. Should we be afraid (bbc.com) 7

TropicalCoder writes: Prof Stephen Hawking, one of Britain's pre-eminent scientists, has said that efforts to create thinking machines pose a threat to our very existence. He told the BBC: "The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race."

These guys are clearly not software engineers, and have been watching too many science fiction films. Seems Stephen Hawking has a new voice that has scared him. Machine learning experts from the British company Swiftkey were involved in its creation. Their technology, already employed as a smartphone keyboard app, "learns how the professor thinks" and suggests the words he might want to use next.

Maybe he thinks it's gonna attack him and take over his identity one day, and nobody outside his world would know it's not really him?. Give me a break! These intelligent people should know enough not to venture into areas they don't understand.

I have played with neural networks myself, and they can only do what they are programmed to do. Of course they can be dangerous as much as any other software tool if, for example, employed by the NSA to sift through the petabytes of data they have on us all, Watson style. But then the danger comes from how the knowledge gained is used, not from the AI itself

Comment Re:Anyone for a game of pool? (Score 1) 184

Seriously, what if one of these stars smashed into another similar one headed right for it at relativistic speed? It would be like the Large Hadron Collider at astronomical scale. Maybe it would create a star made of Higg's Bosons or who knows what. Maybe the resulting collision would create a Black Hole so dense it would suck in the entire Universe.

Then I had another, totally different thought. Suppose one of these happened to be passing by... You could send a space ship at normal velocity up to meet it in such a way it gets captured by the gravity of the star and gets pulled along with it. Of course, you might experience some pretty wicked acceleration that could leave you a puddle of red goo on the deck, but that's the chance you might take.. Alternatively, get it to fling you in whatever direction you want to go via the slingshot effect. You should be able to pick up a relativistic velocity from it for free. Maybe that was what the author meant when he suggest it could seed life in other galaxies.

Comment Re:Confession - I didn't like Interstellar (Score 1) 289

I didn't like it either. It left me flat, like I had wasted my time watching it. It somehow reminded me of Contact, and after reading the comments, I now understand there was some cross-fertilization from people involved in that. I didn't like the way Contact turned out either. Been a SciFi fan all my life. We had two great topics with these films - first contact, and time travel. I have read many great stories that employed these themes, but the movies had to turn them into some kind of supernatural, quasi-religious experience - something like Ghost, I suppose. I was very disappointed in these movies.

Comment Re:You will not go to wormhole today. (Score 1) 289

"Gravity waves travel faster than light." Interesting - hadn't heard of that. If they do, it must be by cheating - warping SpaceTime, to do it. As far as entangled particles communicating with each other faster than the speed of light goes, we cannot take advantage of that phenomenon, so we are safe from violating Causality.

Comment Re:Baby meet bathwater (Score 1) 289

I visited your fair state back early in the year. Drove from the Grand Canyon to Flagstaff then down the mountains to Phoenix - speed limit: 80 mph, just a-flying down those mountains! Had to keep up or would have gotten run over by trucks and vehicles behind. What a wild ride! Visited Phoenix, where it seems nobody works. Instead they all come down from the mountains to party there, best I could understand. Visited South Mountain and saw the stately Saguaro Cactus standing guard over that sacred mountain. They are so cool! Though you see them in every cowboy movie filmed anywhere, they only grow there in AZ, mainly there on South Mountain on the southern outskirts of Phoenix. After a night partying in the city, next morning took Highway 8 towards Yuma, then down for a brief visit across the border at Mexicali before heading back to California. Will never forget that trip, and hope to return some day. I think I like your state.

btw: You forgot to mention - there is no fucking daylight savings in Arizona.

Comment Re:Bail terms - no more money making (Score 4, Interesting) 166

The story at Ars has a video of an candid interview Kim Dotcom did with the press a couple of days ago... http://arstechnica.com/tech-po...

I listened to the whole thing, and found it very interesting. Kim Dotcom gave fairly straight forward responses, and came off for me as an intelligent, not so bad guy. For sure it would be easy for us to envy his wealth, but IMHO he came about it by exploiting loopholes in the law, not by breaking the law.

Instead of pursuing Kim Dotcom to the ends of the earth (Sorry, NZers), why doesn't the US DOJ expend their effort prosecuting the crooks on Wall Street whole defrauded the whole world of a trillion dollars selling those bogus Credit Default Swaps that led up to the crash of 2008? Not one has been prosecuted, nor will they ever be.

Comment Re:Why are medallions sold and not leased? (Score 2) 329

I'm sure I'll get flamed for writing this as a driver

I won't flame you, but I would suggest being a taxi driver might motivate you to write a little FUD. Obviously, the existence of Uber is a serious threat to the status quo with taxi drivers. In fact this whole article is about how much owners of these medallions have to lose. Please bare with me a moment while I question something here...

You say...

Uber has succeeded in remaking the cab market and externalizing all equipment costs and liability to the drivers, all while actually even paying them (unbelievably) less than the chicken-scratch cab drivers already make, and all the while pretending they do something different than charge money for a ride somewhere. Many drivers are making 3-4 dollars an hour after vehicle maintenance, depreciation, taxes, water and snacks for passengers, and Uber's 20% and assorted fees.

.

If it was as bad as you say, nobody would drive for Uber. Yes, their fare is going to be lower than a typical taxi, and Uber gets their cut, but on the other hand, they don't have to pay a hefty "Medallion Rent". See this paragraph I lifted from a comment by LGW below...

.

You do realize many/most taxi drivers are part time, right? The normal system in most places means only the most successful drivers actually own a taxi. The rest rent by car by the calendar day, and pay a hefty sum for that. The result is it's normal to try to stay awake for as much of that 48 hours as possible, as it takes many hours of driving just to cover the fixed daily cost of the taxi, then sleep for a day or two, then repeat. This is not a system geared towards safety!

.

Does an Uber driver have to suffer like that? I doubt it.

Comment Re:An act of infringement (Score 4, Interesting) 187

How do they even know it was "Cox subscriber having IP address 24.252.149.211", as opposed to his neighbour who tapped into his WiFi?

Lest someone think this is a lame excuse, let me tell you my own experience...

The first month after I got the internet connection set up in my new place, my ISP noted my 64 gb data cap was exceeded, and they made a courtesy call to see if they could up sell me on more bandwidth. I was totally shocked, because I know my normal data usage would never come close to that limit. Somebody obviously cracked my relatively simple password and hacked into my modem. I immediately changed that to the longest password it would accept, and there has been no more data overages since. What do you suppose my WiFi was being used for? Could well have been for downloading copyrighted material, which certainly I hadn't been doing. What if the copyright police came after me for this? I would be pretty pissed off!

Comment Re:You get my point? (Score 2) 187

Agreed, except - this isn't even about people who download copyrighted material without permission. This is about allegations that people are downloading copyrighted material without permission. That's all - allegations. There was nothing proven in a court of law - just some scum bag outfit like John Steele & Co. called "Rightscorp" pointing their fingers at IP addresses that may or may not connect with people they are accusing of downloading.

Comment Re:No proof (Score 1) 187

I also think Cox should establish a reasonable handling charge for investigating and dealing with these automated complaints

Whoa - you don't want to go there! Cox treats Rightscorp's settlement notices to users as spam, which is exactly how they should be dealt with, but turns out many other ISPs are going along with this bullshit from Rightscorp. That got me thinking - why? My guess is that maybe they are getting paid - maybe in some cases, well paid. Seems logical to me that would make a good strategy for the copyright maximalists if they can show that most ISPs go along with their agenda. Then when they take an ISP like Cox to court it makes them look better. It's like Microsoft and their "Android patents" scam. They make every licensee sign an NDA so they can go around bullying other Android OEMs and tell them all these others are paying up big so they better pay up big too. In reality, in most cases we have no idea how much royalty was paid, if any.

Slashdot Top Deals

The best way to accelerate a Macintoy is at 9.8 meters per second per second.

Working...